From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87ECB1ABEA1; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:52:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728917558; cv=none; b=QbZOgY4GfHSu+dEWN0vw88BGQOCo7QE6nghSD/9kcESiIe5gCBhkvFilBL8Rm+jS6e1s6cyVmrX8HOvwQnB1d+AC2+w5hH6D1tREEcrXkPSOqQDoG7voSwT/iGUoazirfG/DF7o6KoLcnfizPze3CpJkiwbpgVu3J171hkEsb+0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728917558; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uxo5D8JEE2gZBh8sDaBNWx7t9cUZcmpL2kbkePFZ/xQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NqRaXnPQMJrKQloDy4aCes+us/7JMZCVmdC0vQM0pVg3UjYD318lxSXfSaY4xE1p5g75w+R5XF5f6fi721gUA6MJMN1Gty2f13vObnF2pqLV3mwxHlkvSdocyV5tx1mUDXW1fS5MDaVNri4Lz3ACyXtKnMp82Lxkzs1BsJ4Tdxg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=q9C3/OHQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="q9C3/OHQ" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 34D29418B6 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1728917548; bh=IPjHIbXcy5jXBF/wBcu480WxfaMpsqD/kMn6ggCPryo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=q9C3/OHQ0p/IJlc9s6RF53wQKXaEWii1ZCj2F5l7gprhQnhK//q6AjWk2pdyIQKIT rv6c00mXLkX+lpNStooBdwERxe4BMiUxQQ6m6X8dwPTzAlFz0+qKe5nSQ49EGewecu SiMD1Yl1P0n7qVhhV0RsXR6iwfyRhoinPIDVASKAukyE3Riq8V80fq3Km9uKmkmnTB Cme3GgYWpFokdLGjCrjH0O+UJm+rqip3PhtTjRTM+lO+BNT6STYkg9SYzFaD5ikxdS jBXyf2V4s3zbCxl3ahkXPk3slFqaSjMDuXY9OCG88AwWD4S6U6KnJkGiQu8IzMBBbd LefVACUnsgQAQ== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 34D29418B6; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:52:28 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Stephen Rothwell , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann Cc: ARM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the jc_docs tree In-Reply-To: <20241014130336.06b99889@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20241014130336.06b99889@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 08:52:27 -0600 Message-ID: <87r08iu47o.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Stephen Rothwell writes: > Hi all, > > The following commit is also in the arm-soc-fixes tree as a different > commit (but the same patch): > > 6330e80ef1a2 ("Documentation/process: maintainer-soc: clarify submitting patches") > > This is commit > > 29ce0bca6d5f ("Documentation/process: maintainer-soc: clarify submitting patches") > > in the arm-soc-fixes tree. I can drop my copy, I guess. Thanks, jon