From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FC54136990; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 16:08:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712074103; cv=none; b=sC8R6aWGhPSyP08G6a9f4FzOr7HGlr8w9iMzreZDr82ZQkuZPkNZRpM7Ywlxka0pigo/I7UDc82RlcEN/WoP/7bBKw9uOSqEMo3XkOHWc0QY8Afh6G6mUzxCc67uHw77dE9vlYDwIqzOk0UUHefVas4fU6A/wrrwtYztwwXGg4k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712074103; c=relaxed/simple; bh=23pqOOguUxwf+LlNromuawcHxktlPOCtCpPzM0ENPtI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=U7320wLkYk3WOetci8ThHdqH4S1maTaWOvM/xan7V3k4m+fTcRmkhMyMjSHkvTLJn4MFbOFbL238MQgwb3+AtQKpnvdWGNJwHHiW6Qf3POoU+8whYwBSJphqqPO2Zeim4Bam8JC+dm5JqhIolTme+91deqWsotw27re74HZdtBc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=LWK3upwT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="LWK3upwT" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 9FF5247C3C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1712074101; bh=23pqOOguUxwf+LlNromuawcHxktlPOCtCpPzM0ENPtI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=LWK3upwTNkKNQHwEia1hNlcwpjRg+QpVu/4dVwwvnol6g/XonRQE/Kq/h6+/Mjq7g JumnRrJA/Gj2qQtrETtRIJjzyP8tIsp/ttgYNATOgzWcSnQUBSJakaWC7f/I/y0fla f14iwDjScbHjc3PhV6az7p23WxYcAheUJx6a7hh00QVZhfAi/TLF45pLaLU9FVrQz9 M4rehryoyTe/7O/sZCPZpWImuCzyydB20oio1EXeegq+FEGP3nsmW4Ki1w8uihJAsH eXB98prpB0pGc3YNe4l/hUW+q4WR/W0YxKGkfaEEM2d/H2I4RUWhtIOLMTaA3xiQ3l HRg2krCW25+Qw== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::646]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9FF5247C3C; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 16:08:21 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Niklas Cassel , Frank Li Cc: rdunlap@infradead.org, hch@infradead.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, lizhijian@fujitsu.com, mst@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] docs: dma: correct dma_set_mask() sample code In-Reply-To: References: <20240401174159.642998-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 10:08:20 -0600 Message-ID: <87r0fnvjbf.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Niklas Cassel writes: >> +dma_set_mask_and_coherent() will never return failure when bigger then 32. > > Nit: > s/then/than/ I hadn't pushed anything yet, so I took the liberty of going and fixing this one, thanks. jon