public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "mhklinux@outlook.com" <mhklinux@outlook.com>,
	"jgross@suse.com" <jgross@suse.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"arjan@linux.intel.com" <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	"kprateek.nayak@amd.com" <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	"Tang, Feng" <feng.tang@intel.com>,
	"kan.liang@linux.intel.com" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	"thomas.lendacky@amd.com" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	"ray.huang@amd.com" <ray.huang@amd.com>,
	"Mehta, Sohil" <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
	"Sivanich, Dimitri" <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>,
	"paulmck@kernel.org" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	"andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"andy@infradead.org" <andy@infradead.org>,
	"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch v2 25/30] x86/cpu/topology: Use topology logical mapping mechanism
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 17:21:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r0hhk60e.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5024c989133441608592ef86bc78ca2573bcc728.camel@intel.com>

On Fri, Feb 02 2024 at 06:45, Rui Zhang wrote:
>> @@ -147,6 +148,9 @@ static void topo_set_ids(struct topo_sca
>>         c->topo.pkg_id = topo_shift_apicid(apicid, TOPO_PKG_DOMAIN);
>>         c->topo.die_id = topo_shift_apicid(apicid, TOPO_DIE_DOMAIN);
>>  
>> +       c->topo.logical_pkg_id = topology_get_logical_id(apicid,
>> TOPO_PKG_DOMAIN);
>> +       c->topo.logical_die_id = topology_get_logical_id(apicid,
>> TOPO_DIE_DOMAIN);
>> +
>
> Just wondering if we could have logical_core_id.
>
> drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c uses an array to save per core temperature
> information. We cannot use core_id as array index because it can be
> sparse. Currently, to get the temperature info for a specified core,
> we need to traverse the array to know which core each entry maps to.
>
> Ideally, we could have a global logical_core_id, and use that as the
> array index directly.
> This can also simplify kernel code in many places when checking if two
> cpus are in the same core or not.

That's trivial to do now :)

It's an orthogonal change and we can put it on top once this pile is
merged.

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-12 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-23 13:10 [patch v2 00/30] x86/apic: Rework APIC registration Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:10 ` [patch v2 01/30] x86/cpu/topology: Move registration out of APIC code Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:10 ` [patch v2 02/30] x86/cpu/topology: Provide separate APIC registration functions Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:10 ` [patch v2 03/30] x86/acpi: Use new " Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:10 ` [patch v2 04/30] x86/jailhouse: Use new APIC registration function Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:10 ` [patch v2 05/30] x86/of: Use new APIC registration functions Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:10 ` [patch v2 06/30] x86/mpparse: Use new APIC registration function Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 07/30] x86/acpi: Dont invoke topology_register_apic() for XEN PV Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 08/30] x86/xen/smp_pv: Register fake APICs Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 09/30] x86/cpu/topology: Confine topology information Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 10/30] x86/cpu/topology: Simplify APIC registration Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 11/30] x86/cpu/topology: Use a data structure for topology info Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 12/30] x86/smpboot: Make error message actually useful Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 13/30] x86/cpu/topology: Sanitize the APIC admission logic Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 14/30] x86/cpu/topology: Rework possible CPU management Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-31 23:47   ` Sohil Mehta
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 15/30] x86/cpu: Detect real BSP on crash kernels Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-31 17:59   ` Michael Kelley
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 16/30] x86/topology: Add a mechanism to track topology via APIC IDs Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 17/30] x86/cpu/topology: Reject unknown APIC IDs on ACPI hotplug Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 18/30] x86/cpu/topology: Assign hotpluggable CPUIDs during init Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 19/30] x86/xen/smp_pv: Count number of vCPUs early Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 20/30] x86/cpu/topology: Let XEN/PV use topology from CPUID/MADT Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 21/30] x86/cpu/topology: Use topology bitmaps for sizing Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-26  7:07   ` Zhang, Rui
2024-01-26 20:22     ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-28 20:01       ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-12 16:40       ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-02-12 19:49         ` Michael Kelley
2024-02-13 20:23         ` Sohil Mehta
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 22/30] x86/cpu/topology: Mop up primary thread mask handling Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 23/30] x86/cpu/topology: Simplify cpu_mark_primary_thread() Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 24/30] x86/cpu/topology: Provide logical pkg/die mapping Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 25/30] x86/cpu/topology: Use topology logical mapping mechanism Thomas Gleixner
2024-02-01 22:31   ` Sohil Mehta
2024-02-02  6:45   ` Zhang, Rui
2024-02-12 16:21     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 26/30] x86/cpu/topology: Retrieve cores per package from topology bitmaps Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 27/30] x86/cpu/topology: Rename smp_num_siblings Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 28/30] x86/cpu/topology: Rename topology_max_die_per_package() Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 29/30] x86/cpu/topology: Provide __num_[cores|threads]_per_package Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 30/30] x86/cpu/topology: Get rid of cpuinfo::x86_max_cores Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-24 14:31 ` [patch v2 00/30] x86/apic: Rework APIC registration Zhang, Rui
2024-02-01 22:10 ` Sohil Mehta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r0hhk60e.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox