From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "mhklinux@outlook.com" <mhklinux@outlook.com>,
"jgross@suse.com" <jgross@suse.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"arjan@linux.intel.com" <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
"kprateek.nayak@amd.com" <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Tang, Feng" <feng.tang@intel.com>,
"kan.liang@linux.intel.com" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
"thomas.lendacky@amd.com" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
"ray.huang@amd.com" <ray.huang@amd.com>,
"Mehta, Sohil" <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
"Sivanich, Dimitri" <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>,
"paulmck@kernel.org" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
"andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"andy@infradead.org" <andy@infradead.org>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch v2 25/30] x86/cpu/topology: Use topology logical mapping mechanism
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 17:21:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r0hhk60e.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5024c989133441608592ef86bc78ca2573bcc728.camel@intel.com>
On Fri, Feb 02 2024 at 06:45, Rui Zhang wrote:
>> @@ -147,6 +148,9 @@ static void topo_set_ids(struct topo_sca
>> c->topo.pkg_id = topo_shift_apicid(apicid, TOPO_PKG_DOMAIN);
>> c->topo.die_id = topo_shift_apicid(apicid, TOPO_DIE_DOMAIN);
>>
>> + c->topo.logical_pkg_id = topology_get_logical_id(apicid,
>> TOPO_PKG_DOMAIN);
>> + c->topo.logical_die_id = topology_get_logical_id(apicid,
>> TOPO_DIE_DOMAIN);
>> +
>
> Just wondering if we could have logical_core_id.
>
> drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c uses an array to save per core temperature
> information. We cannot use core_id as array index because it can be
> sparse. Currently, to get the temperature info for a specified core,
> we need to traverse the array to know which core each entry maps to.
>
> Ideally, we could have a global logical_core_id, and use that as the
> array index directly.
> This can also simplify kernel code in many places when checking if two
> cpus are in the same core or not.
That's trivial to do now :)
It's an orthogonal change and we can put it on top once this pile is
merged.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-12 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-23 13:10 [patch v2 00/30] x86/apic: Rework APIC registration Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:10 ` [patch v2 01/30] x86/cpu/topology: Move registration out of APIC code Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:10 ` [patch v2 02/30] x86/cpu/topology: Provide separate APIC registration functions Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:10 ` [patch v2 03/30] x86/acpi: Use new " Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:10 ` [patch v2 04/30] x86/jailhouse: Use new APIC registration function Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:10 ` [patch v2 05/30] x86/of: Use new APIC registration functions Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:10 ` [patch v2 06/30] x86/mpparse: Use new APIC registration function Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 07/30] x86/acpi: Dont invoke topology_register_apic() for XEN PV Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 08/30] x86/xen/smp_pv: Register fake APICs Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 09/30] x86/cpu/topology: Confine topology information Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 10/30] x86/cpu/topology: Simplify APIC registration Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 11/30] x86/cpu/topology: Use a data structure for topology info Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 12/30] x86/smpboot: Make error message actually useful Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 13/30] x86/cpu/topology: Sanitize the APIC admission logic Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 14/30] x86/cpu/topology: Rework possible CPU management Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-31 23:47 ` Sohil Mehta
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 15/30] x86/cpu: Detect real BSP on crash kernels Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-31 17:59 ` Michael Kelley
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 16/30] x86/topology: Add a mechanism to track topology via APIC IDs Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 17/30] x86/cpu/topology: Reject unknown APIC IDs on ACPI hotplug Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 18/30] x86/cpu/topology: Assign hotpluggable CPUIDs during init Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 19/30] x86/xen/smp_pv: Count number of vCPUs early Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 20/30] x86/cpu/topology: Let XEN/PV use topology from CPUID/MADT Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 21/30] x86/cpu/topology: Use topology bitmaps for sizing Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-26 7:07 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-01-26 20:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-28 20:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-12 16:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-02-12 19:49 ` Michael Kelley
2024-02-13 20:23 ` Sohil Mehta
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 22/30] x86/cpu/topology: Mop up primary thread mask handling Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 23/30] x86/cpu/topology: Simplify cpu_mark_primary_thread() Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 24/30] x86/cpu/topology: Provide logical pkg/die mapping Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 25/30] x86/cpu/topology: Use topology logical mapping mechanism Thomas Gleixner
2024-02-01 22:31 ` Sohil Mehta
2024-02-02 6:45 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-02-12 16:21 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 26/30] x86/cpu/topology: Retrieve cores per package from topology bitmaps Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 27/30] x86/cpu/topology: Rename smp_num_siblings Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 28/30] x86/cpu/topology: Rename topology_max_die_per_package() Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 29/30] x86/cpu/topology: Provide __num_[cores|threads]_per_package Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 13:11 ` [patch v2 30/30] x86/cpu/topology: Get rid of cpuinfo::x86_max_cores Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-24 14:31 ` [patch v2 00/30] x86/apic: Rework APIC registration Zhang, Rui
2024-02-01 22:10 ` Sohil Mehta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r0hhk60e.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox