public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, "Brown\,
	Len" <len.brown@intel.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"Liu\, Jing2" <jing2.liu@intel.com>,
	"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Expand the xstate buffer on the first use of dynamic user state
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 15:33:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r1jyaxum.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJvTdKkZEWTsqhXLC+qiQ49c2xn7GDF95PfTBi0rw1FnE--JKQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 29 2021 at 09:14, Len Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 6:14 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 21 2021 at 10:56, Chang S. Bae wrote:
>> > +
>> > +/* Update MSR IA32_XFD with xfirstuse_not_detected() if needed. */
>> > +static inline void xdisable_switch(struct fpu *prev, struct fpu *next)
>> > +{
>> > +     if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XFD) || !xfirstuse_enabled())
>> > +             return;
>> > +
>> > +     if (unlikely(prev->state_mask != next->state_mask))
>> > +             xdisable_setbits(xfirstuse_not_detected(next));
>> > +}
>>
>> So this is invoked on context switch. Toggling bit 18 of MSR_IA32_XFD
>> when it does not match. The spec document says:
>>
>>   "System software may disable use of Intel AMX by clearing XCR0[18:17], by
>>    clearing CR4.OSXSAVE, or by setting IA32_XFD[18]. It is recommended that
>>    system software initialize AMX state (e.g., by executing TILERELEASE)
>>    before doing so. This is because maintaining AMX state in a
>>    non-initialized state may have negative power and performance
>>    implications."
>>
>> I'm not seeing anything related to this. Is this a recommendation
>> which can be ignored or is that going to be duct taped into the code
>> base once the first user complains about slowdowns of their non AMX
>> workloads on that machine?
>
> I found the author of this passage, and he agreed to revise it to say this
> was targeted primarily at VMMs.

Why would this only a problem for VMMs?

> "negative power and performance implications" refers to the fact that
> the processor will not enter C6 when AMX INIT=0, instead it will demote
> to the next shallower C-state, eg C1E.
>
> (this is because the C6 flow doesn't save the AMX registers)
>
> For customers that have C6 enabled, the inability of a core to enter C6
> may impact the maximum turbo frequency of other cores.

That's the same on bare metal, right?

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-29 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-21 18:56 [PATCH v4 00/22] x86: Support Intel Advanced Matrix Extensions Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 01/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Modify the initialization helper to handle both static and dynamic buffers Chang S. Bae
2021-03-10 13:40   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 02/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Modify state copy helpers " Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 03/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Modify address finders " Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 04/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Modify the context restore helper " Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 05/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Add a new variable to indicate dynamic user states Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 06/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Add new variables to indicate dynamic xstate buffer size Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 07/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Calculate and remember dynamic xstate buffer sizes Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 08/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Convert the struct fpu 'state' field to a pointer Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 09/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce helpers to manage the xstate buffer dynamically Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 10/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Define the scope of the initial xstate data Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 11/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Update the xstate save function to support dynamic states Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 12/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Update the xstate buffer address finder " Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 13/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Update the xstate context copy function " Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 14/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Expand the xstate buffer on the first use of dynamic user state Chang S. Bae
2021-03-20 22:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-20 22:21     ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-23 21:01       ` Len Brown
2021-03-24  3:14         ` Liu, Jing2
2021-03-24 21:09           ` Len Brown
2021-03-24 21:26             ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-24 21:30               ` Dave Hansen
2021-03-24 21:42                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-24 21:58                   ` Dave Hansen
2021-03-24 22:12                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-25  5:12             ` Liu, Jing2
2021-03-25  6:59               ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-03-25  7:26                 ` Liu, Jing2
2021-03-23 21:52     ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-03-24 14:24       ` Dave Hansen
2021-03-29 13:14     ` Len Brown
2021-03-29 13:33       ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-03-29 15:43         ` Len Brown
2021-03-29 16:06           ` Len Brown
2021-03-29 17:43             ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-29 18:57               ` Len Brown
2021-03-29 18:49           ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-29 22:16             ` Len Brown
2021-03-30  8:28               ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-30 16:38                 ` Len Brown
2021-03-26 16:34   ` Jann Horn
2021-03-29 18:14     ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 15/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Support ptracer-induced xstate buffer expansion Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 16/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Extend the table to map state components with features Chang S. Bae
2021-03-20 21:25   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:52     ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 17/22] x86/cpufeatures/amx: Enumerate Advanced Matrix Extension (AMX) feature bits Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 18/22] x86/fpu/amx: Define AMX state components and have it used for boot-time checks Chang S. Bae
2021-03-20 21:31   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:52     ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 19/22] x86/fpu/amx: Enable the AMX feature in 64-bit mode Chang S. Bae
2021-03-20 21:26   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:51     ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 20/22] selftest/x86/amx: Include test cases for the AMX state management Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 21/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Support dynamic user state in the signal handling path Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 22/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce boot-parameters to control state component support Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 19:30   ` Randy Dunlap
2021-02-21 20:10     ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-02-21 20:37       ` Randy Dunlap
2021-03-20 20:56   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-25 22:59     ` Len Brown
2021-03-25 23:10       ` Dave Hansen
2021-03-26 15:27         ` Len Brown
2021-03-26 19:22           ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-26  1:41       ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-26 15:33         ` Len Brown
2021-03-26 15:48           ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-26 17:53             ` Len Brown
2021-03-26 18:12               ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-27  4:53                 ` Len Brown
2021-03-27 22:20                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-29 13:31                     ` Len Brown
2021-03-29 14:10                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-26 18:17               ` Borislav Petkov
2021-03-27  4:41                 ` Len Brown
2021-03-26  1:50       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-26 15:36         ` Len Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r1jyaxum.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=jing2.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox