From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8732C10DCE for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 12:09:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8132084E for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 12:09:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726646AbgCFMJW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Mar 2020 07:09:22 -0500 Received: from albireo.enyo.de ([37.24.231.21]:58366 "EHLO albireo.enyo.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726300AbgCFMJW (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Mar 2020 07:09:22 -0500 Received: from [172.17.203.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de) by albireo.enyo.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1jABmy-0002N2-LF; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:09:12 +0000 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jABlN-0005No-Ln; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 13:07:33 +0100 From: Florian Weimer To: YunQiang Su Cc: Laurent Vivier , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Greg KH , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Al Viro , James Bottomley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_misc: pass binfmt_misc P flag to the interpreter References: <20200306080905.173466-1-syq@debian.org> <87r1y53npd.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <8441f497-61eb-5c14-bf1e-c90a464105a7@vivier.eu> <87mu8t3mlw.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <40da389d-4e74-2644-2e7c-04d988fcc26f@vivier.eu> <87v9nhzp6w.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 13:07:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: (YunQiang Su's message of "Fri, 6 Mar 2020 19:48:35 +0800") Message-ID: <87r1y5zny2.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * YunQiang Su: > Florian Weimer 于2020年3月6日周五 下午7:42写道: >> >> * YunQiang Su: >> >> > AT_* only has 32 slot and now. I was afraid that maybe we shouldn't take one. >> > /* AT_* values 18 through 22 are reserved */ >> > 27,28,29,30 are not used now. >> > Which should we use? >> >> Where does this limit of 32 tags come from? I don't see it from a >> userspace perspective. > > Sorry it is my mistake: In linux/auxvec.h, I saw > > #define AT_RANDOM 25 /* address of 16 random bytes */ > #define AT_HWCAP2 26 /* extension of AT_HWCAP */ > > #define AT_EXECFN 31 /* filename of program */ > > The number jump to 31 from 26. > > It is my fault: in x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/auxv.h, the max number is 47 now. So AT_* tags aren't a scarce resource after all?