From: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
To: "Wyborny\, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>,
"e1000-devel\@lists.sourceforge.net"
<e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e interface hang on 82574L
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:19:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r4wova0b.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9BBC4E0CF881AA4299206E2E1412B6260E512E0C@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com> (Carolyn Wyborny's message of "Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:59:41 +0000")
On 19 Mar 2012, Carolyn Wyborny stated:
> So, at least we are clear in your situation, the ASPM needs to be
> disabled. Please let me know if there are continued problems after
> booting with pcie_aspm=off.
If you look further down in
<http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3170405&group_id=42302&atid=447449>
you'll see that I tested that, and it doesn't work :( even if it did
work, it shouldn't be needed: the driver attempts to turn off PCIe ASPM
on affected NICs, and fails, apparently because *something* turns it
back on again.
--
NULL && (void)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-19 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-27 22:01 e1000e interface hang on 82574L Chris Boot
2011-12-27 22:33 ` Dave Taht
2011-12-31 9:31 ` Chris Boot
2012-01-03 0:02 ` Wyborny, Carolyn
2012-01-04 17:12 ` Chris Boot
2012-01-15 11:10 ` Chris Boot
2012-01-16 15:56 ` Wyborny, Carolyn
2012-01-16 16:04 ` Chris Boot
2012-03-17 15:59 ` Chris Boot
2012-03-17 17:54 ` Chris Boot
2012-03-17 23:50 ` [E1000-devel] " Nix
2012-03-19 14:59 ` Wyborny, Carolyn
2012-03-19 16:19 ` Nix [this message]
2012-03-19 16:29 ` [E1000-devel] " Wyborny, Carolyn
2012-03-19 17:31 ` Nix
2012-04-06 10:17 ` Chris Boot
2012-04-06 12:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-04-06 13:41 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-04-06 13:48 ` Chris Boot
2012-04-06 16:05 ` Nix
2012-04-06 16:04 ` Nix
2012-04-23 21:29 ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] e1000e: 82574 also needs ASPM L1 completely disabled Chris Boot
2012-04-23 21:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] e1000e: Disable ASPM L1 on 82574 Chris Boot
2012-04-23 23:18 ` [E1000-devel] " Jeff Kirsher
2012-04-24 11:08 ` Nix
2012-06-01 21:17 ` Chris Boot
2012-06-07 1:41 ` Greg KH
2012-04-23 21:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] e1000e: Remove special case for 82573/82574 ASPM L1 disablement Chris Boot
2012-04-23 23:18 ` [E1000-devel] " Jeff Kirsher
2012-04-23 23:11 ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] e1000e: 82574 also needs ASPM L1 completely disabled Jesse Brandeburg
2012-04-29 16:45 ` Nix
2012-04-29 18:03 ` Chris Boot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r4wova0b.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix \
--to=nix@esperi.org.uk \
--cc=bootc@bootc.net \
--cc=carolyn.wyborny@intel.com \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox