Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() during suspend with 2.6.25-rc8

Jiri Kosina
2008-04-07T22:11:26Z

On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:

> > I know. However preempt_count is a little bit inconsistent in such cases
> > though.
> And? interrupts off beats preempt count anyways. Why did you write the
> patch? Was there a (incorrect) warning triggered?

Reported at http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/7/130

BTW is also mce_init() (called from mce_resume()) guaranteed to run with
IRQs off?

--
Jiri Kosina