From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1555E13C914 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2025 21:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761772297; cv=none; b=i+/ChGEaC7R3/CM3QhdMTjhA2rSxm50jasJp+zEAkQ4RvPShPTLRi2ba+K4J7GCnT9MG9Gm55AEx4Hlv6T7/dXWPItRg76xnnpLa16ZCxUiOcN7ejCRP4F+RIBmnTTcKvHiT4OXFL13vj5cPMprqiqp8CR0HCC9B5i6tyL2bvxo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761772297; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EKrwOYl2fWXfhR0BobjtUdYPCQBZ+Wop5jQkuQDs4AU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MNfXhBtHvnQSgZAbVPzmNA1mkas76/V/yv6cgs86zIdi45cHeKE3CE4oozpsNDxfmcUAwg+9lKeifTLc/cFSTf+2ePNCw5IAElIx3e8pfK8U8w97UitFsHisBuurfIf19zS9cjPyT1pDoMh+/KgmgvUljD5QuE8ZvVyAfhjaAik= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=tM9fC9EJ; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=1Sb13Lvl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="tM9fC9EJ"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="1Sb13Lvl" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1761772294; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hAcmz8ynqx4JKBtSrkI316xT0kahfzQLfye1XcSJHjY=; b=tM9fC9EJy8OXFCel2LUMY8atYKJy8klYFR27R0/Gx5FpejWzcFOrvNZqXIOezWpCbY/DZP 04jAtNMBgkvMLz+10jKCkMekf86KddB3AXzHd+uljqv9jHI7et7M0T+WhEfRFjQSYP9Vrl L9F8dYsoCggpwxVzDcgER3Cm1dGf9AloMBQqLSV1/zWMkjb9a7WKHOt4ic3d+21kGavSAf 66zA+oR9NQNtIwgtW4DtoFgRmNrFrrwi5EsmSw5+bhnfIO0FMKm2G4h0DWXUHTaOnDEl7v s1IARmzcPv7mc3HskJq62X0ZXPqbcwJwxT2emZsQgxL6rPj9jXOI9XIrPHgGSg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1761772294; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hAcmz8ynqx4JKBtSrkI316xT0kahfzQLfye1XcSJHjY=; b=1Sb13LvlmHd9sKwGQe3MCwjG63C8AVPA5hODwXPTtMz+UYuxY3oWYcPA42t4FfKOgCKZ2z pz3iXh/Y9oZh6fAw== To: Mathieu Desnoyers , LKML Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Gabriele Monaco , Michael Jeanson , Jens Axboe , "Paul E. McKenney" , "Gautham R. Shenoy" , Florian Weimer , Tim Chen , Yury Norov , Shrikanth Hegde Subject: Re: [patch V3 09/20] cpumask: Cache num_possible_cpus() In-Reply-To: <938a1d18-c7b0-45d6-ac4b-4c1246e08044@efficios.com> References: <20251029123717.886619142@linutronix.de> <20251029124515.846126176@linutronix.de> <938a1d18-c7b0-45d6-ac4b-4c1246e08044@efficios.com> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 22:11:33 +0100 Message-ID: <87sef1tnui.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, Oct 29 2025 at 11:54, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > On 2025-10-29 09:09, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > [...] >> >> +void set_cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu, bool possible) > > Unless I'm missing something, I suspect that "set_cpu_possible()" should > be marked as __init. Good point!