From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A124A29D280 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 18:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758045724; cv=none; b=kmW8kPkCZlH4TtZVFsCSDdHseuVbln4Q8B9+ZL7CbcG2wEY7q07d8XDQ2gkmGGKMetMVRDYiOH0nO+CungV/Ph1FXY2+1A0/0BLxzrA7adBfa//686LnFxyORIgEdRUxU+7CHmOk/jHmKL0al3aTsx4CBLAgpzlerr/ue5udTUg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758045724; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rLUOJFZUImaUfo6SdetdAgOJfxOPATvzty/XKsifFnA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uq1r6BDhKtbeioRhjlm9Fn1ZllbqAcunoC/+G5/9nj4gp2NKyS5taLIELu/qI04rMirddk9kJtZo6srWElk/i5LgKSy6f1XHvJsdWfiaMmnmYY0MvpkLUEgzZKbp+N1BAcsjuDbBCGkQfpYKPnhy391Uc8Qew41ANJtD4pxXYZk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=rlizjEY5; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=I3Yh1UNG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="rlizjEY5"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="I3Yh1UNG" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1758045719; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rLUOJFZUImaUfo6SdetdAgOJfxOPATvzty/XKsifFnA=; b=rlizjEY5wByJN9OlvYx1jL11IWtDhp6F60MRFS8WZE3YA9wFEAHVBkH1RIaGaMv/QQoOFh fzbbK23DzyeTlo8nGjAEsIyJKhauBMM+H7Q++grmwg2gOy3x4hqWbpvQmwnWUGuGp4iyyv pu8DgvXl9kqh01D5Yv7Bj90iuqr+Zp+zXJykBWMvdAqxqAzqGKRNmIjGByo+WFxojTL0SR UTPzwx+aSzHl2kTK2PsiTQtP8KjtyKqsZ8iW8/nYITuklCpjcahl6h/DB1RWcBX5UJ3a0l hjumCkdnxhnU1rtwUCGmZeE9gMr4sDWW00HAT87wkpNofBxC2mfFpNquGo5SVg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1758045719; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rLUOJFZUImaUfo6SdetdAgOJfxOPATvzty/XKsifFnA=; b=I3Yh1UNG5fgJcJC/vuiQLI4n8j9+NvVpTX6AYL1Y2vq6+VrlnSSOpesFjngYDEE/Owb7a2 DchTBisnkFxe2ZDg== To: Nam Cao , Marc Zyngier , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Madhavan Srinivasan , Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , Christophe Leroy , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: Nam Cao Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq/msi: Remove msi_post_free() In-Reply-To: <20250916061007.964005-1-namcao@linutronix.de> References: <20250916061007.964005-1-namcao@linutronix.de> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 20:01:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87segm9syx.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, Sep 16 2025 at 08:10, Nam Cao wrote: > The only user of msi_post_free() - powerpc/pseries - has been changed to > use msi_teardown(). > > Remove this unused callback. > > Signed-off-by: Nam Cao > --- > This patch depends on the powerpc/series conversion patch, which is > currently in powerpc tree: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c7a6d8f27fd217021dea4daad777e81a525ae460.1754903590.git.namcao@linutronix.de/ > > I think it is most convenient to apply this patch to powerpc tree, if > everyone is okay with that? Yes. Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner