From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
To: Nathan Lynch <nathan.lynch@amd.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dave.jiang@intel.com, kristen.c.accardi@intel.com,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dmaengine: dmatest: Fix dmatest waiting less when interrupted
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:13:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87senhoq1k.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878qpa13fe.fsf@AUSNATLYNCH.amd.com>
Hi Nathan,
Nathan Lynch <nathan.lynch@amd.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com> writes:
>> Change the "wait for operation finish" logic to take interrupts into
>> account.
>>
>> When using dmatest with idxd DMA engine, it's possible that during
>> longer tests, the interrupt notifying the finish of an operation
>> happens during wait_event_freezable_timeout(), which causes dmatest to
>> cleanup all the resources, some of which might still be in use.
>>
>> This fix ensures that the wait logic correctly handles interrupts,
>> preventing premature cleanup of resources.
>>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202502171134.8c403348-lkp@intel.com
>
> Given the report at the URL above I'm struggling to follow the rationale
> for this change. It looks like a use-after-free in idxd while
> resetting/unbinding the device, and I can't see how changing whether
> dmatest threads perform freezeable waits would change this.
>
I think that the short version is that the reproducition script triggers
different problems on different platforms/configurations.
The solution I proposed fixes a problem I was seeing on a SPR system, on
a GNR system (that I was only able to get later) I see something more similar
to this particular splat (currently working on the fix).
Seeing this question, I realize that I should have added a note to the
commit detailing this.
So I am planning on proposing two (this and another) fixes for the same
report, hoping that it's not that confusing/unusual.
Cheers,
--
Vinicius
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-12 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-05 23:00 [PATCH v1] dmaengine: dmatest: Fix dmatest waiting less when interrupted Vinicius Costa Gomes
2025-03-05 23:14 ` Dave Jiang
2025-03-10 21:06 ` Vinod Koul
2025-03-12 18:58 ` Nathan Lynch
2025-03-12 22:13 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes [this message]
2025-03-13 14:10 ` Nathan Lynch
2025-03-13 16:36 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2025-03-13 21:21 ` Nathan Lynch
2025-03-13 23:29 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2025-03-14 21:35 ` Nathan Lynch
2025-03-14 22:24 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2025-04-02 13:45 ` Nathan Lynch
2025-04-03 3:44 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2025-04-03 16:24 ` Nathan Lynch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87senhoq1k.fsf@intel.com \
--to=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kristen.c.accardi@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathan.lynch@amd.com \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox