From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 864ED227EBE for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 12:12:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739448777; cv=none; b=UAPrKOGl7sTf4zAxYWPnBdw5CbkADus8uj+7qDiZJyHz+4ncuKT5ZFTLykGtPrCIrERaec/pG1+IOBtoPQQa7P+kiTXElyKtyRlQvv0iASDvH3kSc0uj/vRbpoE44uTDcDFVoojsMs1y4cfE2nYSoulDNGrb0+zLa+lpnCOiNjo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739448777; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IkT1HXnvhmnIAy7ak03esG1cDt05Qmm78tFPJg+aYTA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Yj1Bounn6HQH6XlCpeJ2cSz0XLAmOZIhV1p6Zcnxm7dKKC/WrXciKcpaZobD/p1WrCs0TAtfvL13MRFqsnYU+kyovnaOgLz3a25zqTmCSrQHyjGdB+yUNCv0EFYio5KfuVhzsOSkUWxjq82XvMO9lvK8Y931mVVoQOh0MWvkSDw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=nQa5DEVI; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=EQrHOm5e; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="nQa5DEVI"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="EQrHOm5e" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1739448770; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=IkT1HXnvhmnIAy7ak03esG1cDt05Qmm78tFPJg+aYTA=; b=nQa5DEVIVciTNLFayb5YHiTTdqSbOXVAXcAnHis9A8bp5C+WaXQMOIMkXcdAMsAjBZdDnb A24kTgc0opcSVHVjjJOi5cYdyc0sU6M8D7Ba9JdH2b+L+jpTPKHtt1YCrUZj0KJEVvYjCa JR/fm0bGJ30H0OUfwKejyV/bs5vDuiCZD1KGmFODedweYcD5xcYdgYt1K3byL7gXUYT9a/ BffVs1Kvd1hESQYMAST0JoKvSrEjkMuxB8pVHzneOFLGs2+d09YzC9Q2DmIZvZZA7ZG5Yx Tadw7oAGvjS+GOlqNnXCdUxY/3ojA2BQRn5nDt4UtyBRa1v9X27Tvuiu5f+NCA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1739448770; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=IkT1HXnvhmnIAy7ak03esG1cDt05Qmm78tFPJg+aYTA=; b=EQrHOm5eu4qUbGUFL7thOi2PpaAuHnmB/RxDrvQL4TzjrZ+H2ohXWAWggSJtwHR67CDUl4 O90uincGPSZMZsBA== To: Anup Patel , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org Cc: hpa@zytor.com, Marc Zyngier , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Andrew Lunn , Gregory Clement , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , Atish Patra , Andrew Jones , Sunil V L , Anup Patel , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, Anup Patel Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] irqchip/riscv-imsic: Set irq_set_affinity for IMSIC base In-Reply-To: <20250209041655.331470-2-apatel@ventanamicro.com> References: <20250209041655.331470-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com> <20250209041655.331470-2-apatel@ventanamicro.com> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 13:12:49 +0100 Message-ID: <87seoijb5q.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Sun, Feb 09 2025 at 09:46, Anup Patel wrote: > From: Andrew Jones > > Instead of using imsic_irq_set_affinity() for leaf MSI domains, > use imsic_irq_set_affinity() for the non-leaf IMSIC base domain > and use irq_chip_set_affinity_parent() for leaf MSI domains. This clearly lacks an explanation of the purpose/reason of this change.