From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C2DF1B4240 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 11:39:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738150753; cv=none; b=D3lfvVDRGCw0xGAYf3NQBVndQNTIy+lG0JMxycGCkyuOJOjKL3pWMohY2KHm7+WewaWhlMOeouMnrOYxSGarTsEgXi2lVkWvb/nTtXZbOBKaVeTUfEkDaLOzddaUivxcn+xgBJgMdZZWu5d20CAd044FMlhVvS7J3ucb4eodA7A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738150753; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YjpiUbPrOSmPzVMLGbK/rYoXLnOcR4Q9lF9O08A/ZTY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mr17WAr8tMJYflHPTnS86+2RWYFIaA53iMhbbhYaDF7NQGrr1uSHUQNwjtbSXO7hNCfnC0MPo4ZwQ6mAa//+5E4xgkYsebfSXXBwRsu9pwNxuU3NfQ9CvGvHDOtP/WVsXU+7Mj8pm0qt/ujZyOM2v36uyIvMN3cOqB5uzSnuQbw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=JgwjzBqS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="JgwjzBqS" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1738150751; x=1769686751; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=YjpiUbPrOSmPzVMLGbK/rYoXLnOcR4Q9lF9O08A/ZTY=; b=JgwjzBqS9KPNkVM0RU6mqwtmVbKbVj75JgUdG1WG/Kw/GwSkSRqGr8tX Bpg5V7s+VSXC/ZJ5x8PqHl+10e4kSt/fArzPc55R+QYwyI7A7IvTWA+RJ ixUNfu3Qmp9xau2A2qncymlyR/8a01kxQU6qtrDbU2ek/8NwOBRqyWobx x+N8Z6yeDE4MrUGgk+9+0WN5XOnY6N343E2yXZzXNSoW2zZ0jniPPvE+u xTLpZSM3H7BGppIkHyvED9aq4HhcnaKbpMO7y5YuRSTuvoi2iGGINcbDK cDLNuf0KUu0Y72aXBhPupyJhrPQVIz0U+caoQ0PTWDQNGWrPWwPwwYpRZ w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: EN01s20WSGqzMH9MY3hpZg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: xVi+JkF0Qay54669Kok+LA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11329"; a="41498024" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,243,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="41498024" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jan 2025 03:39:10 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: WQ3pUf1KT8SuMAFaL3Hjig== X-CSE-MsgGUID: JLu2nZyRRtSoMC0wMM5u8Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,224,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="109462762" Received: from unknown (HELO ubik) ([10.237.72.184]) by orviesa007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jan 2025 03:39:09 -0800 From: Alexander Shishkin To: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Matthew Wilcox , David Hildenbrand , alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] intel_th: avoid using deprecated page->mapping, index fields In-Reply-To: <64514bd2-0271-4b2e-b1f5-a35520fae4ff@lucifer.local> References: <20241203080001.12341-1-lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> <0fcfc239-19c7-404f-bbc5-70a29ccf6ec0@lucifer.local> <87v7tyyrvb.fsf@ubik.fi.intel.com> <64514bd2-0271-4b2e-b1f5-a35520fae4ff@lucifer.local> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 13:39:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87sep1zw6d.fsf@ubik.fi.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Lorenzo Stoakes writes: > Thanks very much! Yeah just keen to get this in as we are moving towards > removing these fields very soon. My understanding is that this is a part of larger effort to reduce struct page to 8 bytes and an optionally dynamically allocated slightly larger structure, is that correct? Just curious. > Could you take this in your tree? I think that'd work best. Sure, will do. Thanks, -- Alex