From: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, luto@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, max8rr8@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
jhubbard@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/ioremap: Use is_vmalloc_addr in iounmap
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2024 12:28:17 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87seve4e37.fsf@nvdebian.thelocal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66b523ac448e2_c1448294ec@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> writes:
> [ add Alistair and John ]
>
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 08 2024 at 09:39, Dan Williams wrote:
>> > Dan Williams wrote:
>> >> Apologies was trying to quickly reverse engineer how private memory
>> >> might be different than typical memremap_pages(), but it is indeed the
>> >> same in this aspect.
>> >>
>> >> So the real difference is that the private memory case tries to
>> >> allocate physical memory by searching for holes in the iomem_resource
>> >> starting from U64_MAX. That might explain why only the private memory
>> >> case is violating assumptions with respect to high_memory spilling into
>> >> vmalloc space.
>> >
>> > Not U64_MAX, but it starts searching for free physical address space
>> > starting at MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS, see gfr_start().
>>
>> Wait. MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS is either 46 (4-level) or 52 (5-level), which is
>> fully covered by the identity map space.
>>
>> So even if the search starts from top of that space, how do we end up
>> with high_memory > VMALLOC_START?
>>
>> That does not make any sense at all
>
> Max, or Alistair can you provide more details of how private memory spills over
> into the VMALLOC space on these platforms?
Well I was hoping pleading ignorance on x86 memory maps would get me out
of having to look too deeply :-) But alas...
It appears the problem originates in KASLR which can cause the VMALLOC
region to overlap with the top of the linear map.
> I too would have thought that MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS protects against this?
Me too, until about an hour ago. As noted above
request_free_mem_region() allocates from (1 << MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS) - 1
down. Therefore VMALLOC_START needs to be greater than PAGE_OFFSET + (1
<< MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS) - 1. However the default configuration for KASLR
as set by RANDOMIZE_MEMORY_PHYSICAL_PADDING is to only provide 10TB
above what max_pfn is set to at boot time (and even then only if
CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG is enabled).
Obviously ZONE_DEVICE memory ends up being way above that and crosses
into the VMALLOC region. So I think the actual fix is something like:
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index e36261b4ea14..c58d7b0f5bca 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -2277,6 +2277,7 @@ config RANDOMIZE_MEMORY_PHYSICAL_PADDING
depends on RANDOMIZE_MEMORY
default "0xa" if MEMORY_HOTPLUG
default "0x0"
+ range 0x40 0x40 if GET_FREE_REGION
range 0x1 0x40 if MEMORY_HOTPLUG
range 0x0 0x40
help
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-09 2:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-10 10:00 [PATCH 1/1] x86/ioremap: Use is_vmalloc_addr in iounmap Max Ramanouski
2024-08-08 6:12 ` Alistair Popple
2024-08-08 6:44 ` John Hubbard
2024-08-12 6:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-08 14:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-08 15:58 ` Dan Williams
2024-08-08 16:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-08 16:32 ` Dan Williams
2024-08-08 16:39 ` Dan Williams
2024-08-08 18:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-08 19:59 ` Dan Williams
2024-08-09 2:28 ` Alistair Popple [this message]
2024-08-09 3:55 ` Dan Williams
2024-08-10 17:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-12 7:41 ` Alistair Popple
2024-08-12 10:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-12 11:46 ` Alistair Popple
2024-08-12 12:10 ` Max R
2024-08-12 13:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-13 1:33 ` Alistair Popple
2024-08-13 8:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-13 20:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-13 22:29 ` x86/kaslr: Expose and use the end of the physical memory address space Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-14 0:26 ` Alistair Popple
2024-08-14 14:33 ` Dan Williams
2024-08-15 16:11 ` Kees Cook
2024-08-15 22:48 ` Max R
2024-08-16 9:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-16 9:43 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-20 20:38 ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-22 22:31 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87seve4e37.fsf@nvdebian.thelocal \
--to=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=max8rr8@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox