From: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] randomize_kstack: Improve entropy diffusion
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 10:35:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87seya452v.fsf@> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240309202445.work.165-kees@kernel.org> (Kees Cook's message of "Sat, 9 Mar 2024 12:24:48 -0800")
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes:
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/randomize_kstack.h b/include/linux/randomize_kstack.h
> index 5d868505a94e..6d92b68efbf6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/randomize_kstack.h
> +++ b/include/linux/randomize_kstack.h
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(u32, kstack_offset);
> if (static_branch_maybe(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_KSTACK_OFFSET_DEFAULT, \
> &randomize_kstack_offset)) { \
> u32 offset = raw_cpu_read(kstack_offset); \
> - offset ^= (rand); \
> + offset = ror32(offset, 5) ^ (rand); \
Hi Kees,
I'm wondering whether this renders the per-arch mask applied to 'rand'
at the respective choose_random_kstack_offset() invocations ineffective?
Like e.g. on x86 there is
choose_random_kstack_offset(rdtsc() & 0xFF);
I would argue that while before the patch kstack_offset had been
guaranteed to stay within the bounds of 0xFF, it's now effectively
unlimited (well, <= (u32)-1) and only capped to 0x3ff when subsequently
applying the KSTACK_OFFSET_MAX().
Or am I simply missing something?
Thanks!
Nicolai
> raw_cpu_write(kstack_offset, offset); \
> } \
> } while (0)
--
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstraße 146, 90461 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-22 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-09 20:24 [PATCH] randomize_kstack: Improve entropy diffusion Kees Cook
2024-04-03 21:45 ` Kees Cook
2024-05-22 8:35 ` Nicolai Stange [this message]
2024-05-22 19:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87seya452v.fsf@ \
--to=nstange@suse.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox