From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263789AbUEGVU3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2004 17:20:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263799AbUEGVU3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2004 17:20:29 -0400 Received: from mail.enyo.de ([212.9.189.167]:11012 "EHLO mail.enyo.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263789AbUEGVU2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2004 17:20:28 -0400 To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Stephen Hemminger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Distributions vs kernel development References: <20040507085312.3247d70d@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> <409BB334.7080305@pobox.com> From: Florian Weimer Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 23:20:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <409BB334.7080305@pobox.com> (Jeff Garzik's message of "Fri, 07 May 2004 12:03:00 -0400") Message-ID: <87smecgcix.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Jeff Garzik: > Fedora Core runs stock 2.4 and 2.6 kernels just fine... :) Have the problems with 2.4 kernels and Berkeley DB been fixed? -- Current mail filters: many dial-up/DSL/cable modem hosts, and the following domains: atlas.cz, bigpond.com, di-ve.com, hotmail.com, jumpy.it, libero.it, netscape.net, postino.it, simplesnet.pt, tiscali.co.uk, tiscali.cz, tiscali.it, voila.fr, yahoo.com.