public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: "Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@sony.com>,
	"pmladek@suse.com" <pmladek@suse.com>,
	"senozhatsky@chromium.org" <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Shashank Balaji <shashankbalaji02@gmail.com>,
	"john.ogness@linutronix.de" <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
	"francesco@valla.it" <francesco@valla.it>,
	"geert@linux-m68k.org" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	"linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org" <linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] printk: fix zero-valued printk timestamps in early boot
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2026 21:37:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tstu79qn.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260401111244.5057a89c@gandalf.local.home>

On Wed, Apr 01 2026 at 11:12, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Apr 2026 10:33:26 +0200
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org> wrote:
>> As I've demonstrated the time until the first time stamp is available
>> has nothing to do with the number of CPUs and is more or less constant:
>
> So my question is, if something changes in this time frame, where it goes
> from 30ms to 300ms, how would we find out?
>
> Again, for Chromebooks, we get these timestamps from the firmware and it's
> very useful.

I understand all of that and I'm not opposed to make that happen if it's
integrated properly into sched clock as I demonstrated with the PoC
hack.

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-01 19:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-25  5:30 [PATCH] printk: add early_counter_ns routine for printk blind spot Tim Bird
2025-11-25  7:52 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-25 13:08 ` Francesco Valla
2025-11-26  7:38   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-11-27  0:16     ` Bird, Tim
2025-11-27 16:16       ` Petr Mladek
2025-11-26 12:55   ` Petr Mladek
2025-11-27  0:03     ` Bird, Tim
2025-11-26 11:13 ` Petr Mladek
2025-11-27  9:13 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-24 19:40 ` [PATCH v2] printk: fix zero-valued printk timestamps in early boot Tim Bird
2026-01-25 14:41   ` Francesco Valla
2026-01-26 16:52     ` Bird, Tim
2026-02-02 16:23       ` Petr Mladek
2026-01-26 10:12   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-01-26 17:11     ` Bird, Tim
2026-01-27  8:10       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-02-10 23:47 ` [PATCH v3] " Tim Bird
2026-03-04 11:23   ` Petr Mladek
2026-03-09 17:27   ` Shashank Balaji
2026-03-10 10:43     ` Petr Mladek
2026-03-10 19:17     ` Bird, Tim
2026-03-09 19:25   ` Shashank Balaji
2026-03-10 11:39     ` Petr Mladek
2026-03-10 18:54       ` Bird, Tim
2026-03-11 15:45         ` Petr Mladek
2026-03-11 15:47   ` Michael Kelley
2026-03-13  4:52     ` Bird, Tim
2026-03-13 10:45       ` Petr Mladek
2026-03-14 14:16         ` Shashank Balaji
2026-03-24 20:07           ` Bird, Tim
2026-03-14 16:15         ` Michael Kelley
2026-03-24 19:47           ` Bird, Tim
2026-03-26  9:24             ` John Ogness
2026-03-27 18:04               ` Bird, Tim
2026-03-20 18:15         ` Bird, Tim
2026-03-28 15:56         ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-26 13:17   ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-27 18:48     ` Bird, Tim
2026-03-28 21:59       ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-29 22:42         ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-30 12:05           ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-30 13:38           ` David Laight
2026-03-30 20:42         ` Bird, Tim
2026-03-31  8:17           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-03-31  9:10           ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-31 23:36             ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-01  0:05               ` Steven Rostedt
2026-04-01  7:36                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-04-01  8:33                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-01 15:12                   ` Steven Rostedt
2026-04-01 19:37                     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2026-04-01  1:16               ` Brian Masney
2026-04-01  9:19                 ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87tstu79qn.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=Tim.Bird@sony.com \
    --cc=francesco@valla.it \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=shashankbalaji02@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox