From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A99B1C8603; Mon, 19 May 2025 15:02:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747666939; cv=none; b=MzQRW9UODN7NwUHb7Hg0SHUUZVmmBEXXTqj1zYaIpz3kuBmcuuebaeCAjd0dbYYx+NDtHY8VtDDHVWD2RyFxD6MIx3CuG2iLoZAhrWHrjic73ORvbqVWy2ZZN9imzVoAFeFnOqN+G9ggLGA3kSuOg70KJFjYucc74BZrTX4vEko= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747666939; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iOG4uVnyNgfIKYKGomwH6kQE4Zu2JYG+HCSm5JAh6ZA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VEVNlY35xL1gwgLfvebr8/nZs7I+1kXYx7R+Iu74AJNFmZDRe2pGE+EQyV2g0PahJTGuffTIro+lSif6u0KLj5M0Q5qOzp9/a+vvofM2d+18QuaPp221IX75YFeAnNkHu79zinN4aPUO7CoSJBmkZnWjoK/jGLce7Eu0dYDSHG0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=qfO1NOoP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="qfO1NOoP" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 2FC2841EC5 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1747666936; bh=iOG4uVnyNgfIKYKGomwH6kQE4Zu2JYG+HCSm5JAh6ZA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=qfO1NOoP9fPo5gXZIp9Kxaap4jXSGzx6QaMvwFHhzka7t7k3EN3kNrP41vaFiSCs5 gJq8p9rj3QIc2oTX6cETDNXWes9X6h0diMNcaoX5jZ/xQjq+Y08gnIXwtWL/BAhW16 6q6c0i/CU/XdbMdTNQS5NChqD2n7+e7xuSVrORiSHwjA26kCUATp08OlDMJuQpiuHV DFpBWAvTDzizgK0Ggq6w2LUnrr7bLjW3uOzktkKwOdfo2YlLoL/YiE/ROSFTmX0pws rhc1+Of2EITPfUKT/oCXbNGkSlgfzNgmKhQKJc8Ye8CbZe7Yab7J26lsfjnFpLdGjT GNSx1yJSKID2g== Received: from localhost (mdns.lwn.net [45.79.72.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FC2841EC5; Mon, 19 May 2025 15:02:14 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Amir Goldstein , chenlinxuan@uniontech.com Cc: Miklos Szeredi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Bernd Schubert , Bagas Sanjaya Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs: filesystems: add fuse-passthrough.rst In-Reply-To: References: <20250507-fuse-passthrough-doc-v1-0-cc06af79c722@uniontech.com> <20250507-fuse-passthrough-doc-v1-2-cc06af79c722@uniontech.com> Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 09:02:11 -0600 Message-ID: <87tt5giqz0.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Amir Goldstein writes: > On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 7:17=E2=80=AFAM Chen Linxuan via B4 Relay > wrote: >> >> From: Chen Linxuan >> >> Add a documentation about FUSE passthrough. >> >> It's mainly about why FUSE passthrough needs CAP_SYS_ADMIN. >> > > Hi Chen, > > Thank you for this contribution! > > Very good summary. > with minor nits below fix you may add to both patches: > > Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein It looks like these comments were never addressed ... ? Thanks, jon