From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
To: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev, jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fat: Refactor fat_tolower with branchless implementation
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:53:47 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tt7rkn90.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250318034309.920866-1-richard120310@gmail.com>
I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@gmail.com> writes:
> Elimate the need of if-else branch within fat_tolower, replace it with a
> branchless bitwise operation. This can reduce the number of branch ~130
> regarding to the test script[1].
>
> Test size can also be reduced:
> $ ./scripts/bloat-o-meter vmlinux_old vmlinux_new
> add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-68 (-68)
> Function old new delta
> fat_parse_short 1901 1833 -68
> Total: Before=22471023, After=22470955, chg -0.00%
>
> Signed-off-by: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@gmail.com>
> ---
> [1]:
> static inline unsigned char old_tolower(unsigned char c)
> {
> return ((c >= 'A') && (c <= 'Z')) ? c+32 : c;
> }
>
> static inline unsigned char new_tolower(unsigned char c)
> {
> return c | 0x20;
> }
Looks like doesn't work correctly. For example, new one changes TAB to ')'.
Thanks.
> int main(void) {
> for (unsigned char i = 0; i < 26; i++) {
> if (old_tolower('a' + i) != old_tolower('A' + i))
> return 1;
> }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> Utilize perf to profile the difference when using old_tolower() and
> new_tolower().
>
> $ perf stat -e branches,branch-misses --repeat 100 ./old
>
> Performance counter stats for './old':
>
> 2,6302 branches:u
> 2334 branch-misses:u
>
> 0.000754710 seconds time elapsed
>
> 0.000000000 seconds user
> 0.000804000 seconds sys
>
> $ perf stat -e branches,branch-misses --repeat 100 ./new
>
> Performance counter stats for './main':
>
> 2,6172 branches:u
> 2338 branch-misses:u
>
> 0.000782670 seconds time elapsed
>
> 0.000853000 seconds user
> 0.000000000 seconds sys
>
> Best regards,
> I Hsin Cheng
> ---
> fs/fat/dir.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fat/dir.c b/fs/fat/dir.c
> index acbec5bdd521..77d212b4d4db 100644
> --- a/fs/fat/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/fat/dir.c
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
>
> static inline unsigned char fat_tolower(unsigned char c)
> {
> - return ((c >= 'A') && (c <= 'Z')) ? c+32 : c;
> + return c | 0x20;
> }
>
> static inline loff_t fat_make_i_pos(struct super_block *sb,
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-18 4:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-18 3:43 [PATCH] fat: Refactor fat_tolower with branchless implementation I Hsin Cheng
2025-03-18 3:53 ` OGAWA Hirofumi [this message]
2025-03-18 4:03 ` Al Viro
2025-03-19 2:49 ` I Hsin Cheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tt7rkn90.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--to=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard120310@gmail.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox