public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
	"Darren Hart" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Valentin Schneider" <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
	"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/14] futex: Move the retry_private label.
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 21:41:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ttb3743d.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241215230642.104118-8-bigeasy@linutronix.de>

On Mon, Dec 16 2024 at 00:00, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The label futex_requeue in futex_requeue() and futex_wake_op() is jumped
> after the lock is dropped in a retry operation.

The label is jumped? 

> This assumes that the hb does not need to be hashed again. If hb is
> resized then the hb can change if the reference is dropped.

Again 'hb' and the confusion of hash bucket (hb) resize.

> Move the retry_private label before the hashing operation.

The overall explanation is not really comprehensible.

    futex: Re-evaluate the hash bucket after dropping the lock

     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:

     In futex_requeue() and futex_wake_op() the hash bucket lock is
     dropped in the failure paths for handling page faults and other
     error scenarios. After that the code jumps back to retry_private
     which relocks the hash bucket[s] under the assumption that the hash
     bucket pointer which was retrieved via futex_hash() is still valid.
     
     With resizable private hash buckets, that assumption is not longer
     true as the waiters can be moved to a larger hash in the meantime.

     Move the retry_private label above the hashing function to handle
     this correctly.

Or so.

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-16 20:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-15 23:00 [PATCH v5 0/14] futex: Add support task local hash maps Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-15 23:00 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] futex: Create helper function to initialize a hash slot Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-15 23:00 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] futex: Add basic infrastructure for local task local hash Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-15 23:00 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] futex: Allow automatic allocation of process wide futex hash Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-15 23:00 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] futex: Hash only the address for private futexes Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-15 23:00 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] futex: Move private hashing into its own function Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-15 23:00 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] futex: Add helper which include the put of a hb after end of operation Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-16 18:48   ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-12-17 17:07     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-15 23:00 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] futex: Move the retry_private label Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-16 20:41   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-12-15 23:00 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] futex: Introduce futex_get_locked_hb() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-15 23:00 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] futex: Allow to re-allocate the private hash bucket Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-17 14:58   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-15 23:00 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] futex: Resize futex hash table based on number of threads Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-15 23:00 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] futex: Use a hashmask instead of hashsize Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-15 23:00 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] tools/perf: Add the prctl(PR_FUTEX_HASH,…) to futex-hash Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-15 23:00 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] tools/perf: The the current affinity for CPU pinning in futex-hash Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-15 23:00 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] tools/perf: Allocate futex locks on the local CPU-node Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ttb3743d.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox