From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@zytor.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, peterz@infradead.org,
andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, seanjc@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] x86/entry: Set FRED RSP0 on return to userspace instead of context switch
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2024 20:39:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ttfw18jy.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240807054722.682375-4-xin@zytor.com>
On Tue, Aug 06 2024 at 22:47, Xin Li wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/entry-common.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/entry-common.h
> @@ -51,6 +51,11 @@ static inline void arch_exit_to_user_mode_prepare(struct pt_regs *regs,
> if (ti_work & _TIF_USER_RETURN_NOTIFY)
> fire_user_return_notifiers();
>
> + if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_FRED) &&
> + (ti_work & _TIF_LOAD_USER_STATES))
> + wrmsrns(MSR_IA32_FRED_RSP0,
> + (unsigned long)task_stack_page(current) + THREAD_SIZE);
Eyes are bleeding. If you do the inline in patch 1 then this becomes
if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_FRED) && (ti_work & _TIF_LOAD_USER_STATES))
wrmsrns(MSR_IA32_FRED_RSP0, (unsigned long)task_stack_page(current) + THREAD_SIZE);
which is in the 100 character limit and readable.
Though I wonder if this should not have a per CPU cache for that.
if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_FRED) {
unsigned long rsp0 = (unsigned long) task_stack_page(current) + THREAD_SIZE;
if (__this_cpu_read(cpu_fred_rsp0) != rsp0) {
wrmsrns(MSR_IA32_FRED_RSP0, fred_rsp0);
this_cpu_write(cpu_fred_rsp0, rsp0);
}
}
Hmm?
> if (unlikely(ti_work & _TIF_IO_BITMAP))
> tss_update_io_bitmap();
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/switch_to.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/switch_to.h
> index c3bd0c0758c9..a31ea544cc0e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/switch_to.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/switch_to.h
> @@ -71,8 +71,7 @@ static inline void update_task_stack(struct task_struct *task)
> this_cpu_write(cpu_tss_rw.x86_tss.sp1, task->thread.sp0);
> #else
> if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_FRED)) {
> - /* WRMSRNS is a baseline feature for FRED. */
This comment is wrong when using the alternative WRMSR fallback and
should be remove by the alternatives patch.
> - wrmsrns(MSR_IA32_FRED_RSP0, (unsigned long)task_stack_page(task) + THREAD_SIZE);
> + set_thread_flag(TIF_LOAD_USER_STATES);
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-07 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-07 5:47 [PATCH v1 0/3] x86: Write FRED RSP0 on return to userspace Xin Li (Intel)
2024-08-07 5:47 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] x86/entry: Test ti_work for zero before processing individual bits Xin Li (Intel)
2024-08-07 16:21 ` Brian Gerst
2024-08-07 23:03 ` Xin Li
2024-08-07 18:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-07 18:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-07 23:01 ` Xin Li
2024-08-07 5:47 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] x86/msr: Switch between WRMSRNS and WRMSR with the alternatives mechanism Xin Li (Intel)
2024-08-07 18:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-09 23:07 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-08-10 0:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-08-10 0:25 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-08-16 17:52 ` Xin Li
2024-08-16 18:40 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-08-16 19:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-08-16 21:45 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-08-16 21:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-08-16 22:27 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-08-16 22:34 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-08-16 23:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-08-16 22:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-08-17 23:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-08-17 14:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-08-17 14:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-08-17 15:44 ` Xin Li
2024-08-17 19:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-08-18 5:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-08-17 19:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-08-18 5:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-08-18 6:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-08-07 5:47 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] x86/entry: Set FRED RSP0 on return to userspace instead of context switch Xin Li (Intel)
2024-08-07 18:39 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-08-07 21:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-07 23:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-09 10:45 ` Nikolay Borisov
2024-08-09 17:37 ` Xin Li
2024-08-09 22:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ttfw18jy.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).