From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 11/17] signal: Make individual tasks exiting a first class concept
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 23:10:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tthpfu8v.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o77xinmt.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Tue, 18 Jun 2024 23:04:42 -0500")
Add a helper schedule_task_exit_locked that is equivalent to
asynchronously calling exit(2) except for not having an exit code.
This is a generalization of what happens in do_exit, de_thread,
zap_process, prepare_signal, complete_signal, and zap_other_threads
when individual tasks are asked to shutdown.
While schedule_task_exit_locked is a generalization of what happens in
prepare_signal I do not change prepare_signal to use
schedule_task_exit_locked to deliver SIGKILL to a coredumping process.
This keeps all of the specialness of delivering a signal to a
coredumping process limited to prepare_signal and the coredump code
itself.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
fs/coredump.c | 6 +-----
include/linux/sched/signal.h | 2 ++
kernel/exit.c | 5 +----
kernel/signal.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/coredump.c b/fs/coredump.c
index bcef41ec69a9..dce91e5c121a 100644
--- a/fs/coredump.c
+++ b/fs/coredump.c
@@ -371,11 +371,7 @@ static int zap_process(struct task_struct *start, int exit_code)
start->signal->group_stop_count = 0;
for_each_thread(start, t) {
- if (!(t->jobctl & JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT)) {
- task_clear_jobctl_pending(t, JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK);
- t->jobctl |= JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT;
- signal_wake_up(t, 1);
- }
+ schedule_task_exit_locked(t);
nr += (t != current) && !(t->flags & PF_POSTCOREDUMP);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/signal.h b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
index 33bf363a3354..48b67162b38c 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/signal.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
@@ -462,6 +462,8 @@ static inline void ptrace_signal_wake_up(struct task_struct *t, bool resume)
signal_wake_up_state(t, state);
}
+void schedule_task_exit_locked(struct task_struct *task);
+
void task_join_group_stop(struct task_struct *task);
#ifdef TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 73eb3afbf083..902af3beb7cc 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -801,10 +801,7 @@ static void synchronize_group_exit(struct task_struct *tsk, long code)
struct signal_struct *signal = tsk->signal;
spin_lock_irq(&sighand->siglock);
- if (!(tsk->jobctl & JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT)) {
- task_clear_jobctl_pending(tsk, JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK);
- tsk->jobctl |= JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT;
- }
+ schedule_task_exit_locked(tsk);
signal->quick_threads--;
if ((signal->quick_threads == 0) &&
!(signal->flags & SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT)) {
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 341717c6cc97..ac4ac3aeda0a 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1056,11 +1056,7 @@ static void complete_signal(int sig, struct task_struct *p, enum pid_type type)
signal->group_exit_code = sig;
signal->group_stop_count = 0;
__for_each_thread(signal, t) {
- if (!(t->jobctl & JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT)) {
- task_clear_jobctl_pending(t, JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK);
- t->jobctl |= JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT;
- signal_wake_up(t, 1);
- }
+ schedule_task_exit_locked(t);
}
return;
}
@@ -1371,6 +1367,15 @@ int force_sig_info(struct kernel_siginfo *info)
return force_sig_info_to_task(info, current, HANDLER_CURRENT);
}
+void schedule_task_exit_locked(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ if (!(task->jobctl & JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT)) {
+ task_clear_jobctl_pending(task, JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK);
+ task->jobctl |= JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT;
+ signal_wake_up(task, true);
+ }
+}
+
/*
* Nuke all other threads in the group.
*/
@@ -1383,16 +1388,8 @@ int zap_other_threads(struct task_struct *p)
for_other_threads(p, t) {
count++;
-
- /* Only bother with threads that might be alive */
- if (t->jobctl & JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT)
- continue;
-
- task_clear_jobctl_pending(t, JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK);
- t->jobctl |= JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT;
- signal_wake_up(t, 1);
+ schedule_task_exit_locked(t);
}
-
return count;
}
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-19 4:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-09 14:23 [PATCH 0/1] exit: kill signal_struct->quick_threads Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-09 14:24 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-09 18:28 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 10:50 ` Q: css_task_iter_advance() && dying_tasks Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 11:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 20:02 ` Tejun Heo
2024-06-10 20:00 ` Tejun Heo
2024-06-10 12:15 ` [PATCH 0/1] exit: kill signal_struct->quick_threads Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-10 15:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 15:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 16:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-13 15:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-15 14:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-17 18:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 3:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:04 ` [PATCH 0/17] exit: complete synchronize_group_exit Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:05 ` [PATCH 01/17] signal: Make SIGKILL during coredumps an explicit special case Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 15:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 18:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 19:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-21 5:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-21 10:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-21 16:30 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:05 ` [PATCH 02/17] signal: Compute the process exit_code in get_signal Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-25 12:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 4:06 ` [PATCH 03/17] coredump: Consolidate the work to allow SIGKILL during coredumps Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-25 12:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 4:06 ` [PATCH 04/17] signal: In get_signal call do_exit when it is unnecessary to shoot down threads Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-25 12:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 4:07 ` [PATCH 05/17] signal: Bring down all threads when handling a non-coredump fatal signal Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-25 12:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 4:07 ` [PATCH 06/17] signal: Add JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT to mark exiting tasks Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:08 ` [PATCH 07/17] signal: Always set JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT for " Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-30 14:00 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-19 4:08 ` [PATCH 08/17] signal: Don't target tasks that are exiting Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:09 ` [PATCH 09/17] signal: Test for process exit or de_thread using task_exit_pending Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:09 ` [PATCH 10/17] signal: Only set JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT if it is not already set Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:10 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2024-06-19 4:10 ` [PATCH 12/17] signal: Remove zap_other_threads Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:11 ` [PATCH 13/17] signal: Stop skipping current in do_group_exit & get_signal Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-28 5:43 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-19 4:11 ` [PATCH 14/17] signal: Factor out schedule_group_exit_locked Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:12 ` [PATCH 15/17] ptrace: Separate task->ptrace_code out from task->exit_code Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:12 ` [PATCH 16/17] signal: Record the exit_code when an exit is scheduled Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:13 ` [PATCH 17/17] signal: Set SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT when all tasks have decided to exit Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 20:18 ` [PATCH 0/1] exit: kill signal_struct->quick_threads Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tthpfu8v.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox