From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC06C1946BC; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 10:56:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718621811; cv=none; b=LkKhx5GuVntlz+DtdGqso63Uo72VSjvi3NZ3wlx1xQv65XkC3iCojXQ9PV7dKMDkYAPI1vcn3Hp8CpdygyS9PoPNRdcTPmSzFDWnMqjqQgaZJeJwSqL2U+FiZo0Hkf6xS+17fXusqT7GksyqJs9TWMIwVwYtuzuq7q9ghH5EWSw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718621811; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gnkuN2V0yCmQJcyY7kG5C//mMgwPDwk36C1SGnZV8aM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kDLyNjn6eJErj1xCrN1nVnrBCvTyOqn8lInLwwxK9X7Qk17JRcTJB9LUiFRCWftH6lZOzSahebfuhq6/Y6QncGUoyS5OgbZ6RlKJVAxRcflglxM4f81wct9M1GBMvZPFhphOCmbbb9sey/R//NpbsFKh7GUYR7KbENeLAcd2wjI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=VQaK0z65; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="VQaK0z65" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 737A4C2BD10; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 10:56:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1718621811; bh=gnkuN2V0yCmQJcyY7kG5C//mMgwPDwk36C1SGnZV8aM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=VQaK0z65nQyx8dSLveR4KQ2jS5QzZ4SZL7DQzJ+vvZvjMRN1Pum7rMX9MH7x0/oXn Rsxp8eYkG1eN8oRJ4tYc9y7tZixD0csgkrvcM9VEhtYgfxWHIrGZitr1utLUA9zi4S WontDbYTtfO7Eqwi+KU/CCD+mLTBaKeRo9jAETX8J7NP2UqMHW1a8XdJ/2Kyy0Sex4 ZgaZIfRftLjdrAcIiRb3gYS7K+1KJFFn/5WMEDDZ+ZDXapPm9dntLk9oGhCBrfaxsT E7A1sdRVTN0KZ6zPMtkUICu4oev8biZArNCQ+BSi53ZNKHQ+iTW8dkHhw3Js7KrfDa /9AgXmi+zZGiQ== From: Kalle Valo To: "Russell King (Oracle)" Cc: Johannes Berg , Michael Nemanov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless v2] wifi: wlcore: fix wlcore AP mode References: Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:56:48 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Russell King's message of "Sat, 15 Jun 2024 08:26:32 +0100") Message-ID: <87tthrn8gf.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain "Russell King (Oracle)" writes: > I see all my TI Wilink patches have been marked as "deferred" in the > wireless patchwork. Please could you explain what the plan is with > these patches, especially this one which fixes a serious frustrating > failing that makes AP mode on this hardware very unreliable and thus > useless. I'm just swamped with patches, I'll try to look at these soon. I wish that TI would take a more active role in upstream, for example reviewing and testing patches would help a lot. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches