public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix signature of pfn_to_kaddr()
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2023 16:57:40 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ttpyw1ez.fsf@mail.lhotse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231106-virt-to-pfn-fix-ppc-v1-1-93197a7ccab4@linaro.org>

Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> writes:
> There is a const in the returned value from pfn_to_kaddr()
> but there are consumers that want to modify the result
> and the generic function pfn_to_virt() in <asm-generic/page.h>
> does allow this, so let's relax this requirement and do not
> make the returned value const.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311061940.4pBrm44u-lkp@intel.com/
 
I'm struggling to connect the removal of const with those bug reports.
It looks like all those warnings are about 0xc000000000000000 being
outside the range of unsigned long when building 32-bit.

Is it the right bug report link?

The current signature of:

  static inline const void *pfn_to_kaddr(unsigned long pfn) ...

seems OK to me.

It allows code like:

  const void *p = pfn_to_kaddr(pfn);
  p++;

But errors for:

  const void *p = pfn_to_kaddr(pfn);
  unsigned long *q = p;
  *q = 0;

  error: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type


Having said that it looks like almost every caller of pfn_to_kaddr()
casts the result to unsigned long, so possibly that would be the better
return type in terms of the actual usage. Although that would conflict
with __va() which returns void * :/

cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-07  5:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-06 13:44 [PATCH] powerpc: Fix signature of pfn_to_kaddr() Linus Walleij
2023-11-07  5:57 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2023-11-07  8:06   ` Linus Walleij
2023-11-10  6:16     ` Michael Ellerman
2023-11-08 19:24   ` Christophe Leroy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ttpyw1ez.fsf@mail.lhotse \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox