From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Prevent balance_push() on remote runqueues
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 16:07:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tujb0yn1.ffs@tglx> (raw)
sched_setscheduler() and rt_mutex_setprio() invoke the run-queue balance
callback after changing priorities or the scheduling class of a task. The
run-queue for which the callback is invoked can be local or remote.
That's not a problem for the regular rq::push_work which is serialized with
a busy flag in the run-queue struct, but for the balance_push() work which
is only valid to be invoked on the outgoing CPU that's wrong. It not only
triggers the debug warning, but also leaves the per CPU variable push_work
unprotected, which can result in double enqueues on the stop machine list.
Remove the warning and check that the function is invoked on the
outgoing CPU. If not, just return and do nothing.
Fixes: ae7927023243 ("sched: Optimize finish_lock_switch()")
Reported-by: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -8523,7 +8523,6 @@ static void balance_push(struct rq *rq)
struct task_struct *push_task = rq->curr;
lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
- SCHED_WARN_ON(rq->cpu != smp_processor_id());
/*
* Ensure the thing is persistent until balance_push_set(.on = false);
@@ -8531,9 +8530,10 @@ static void balance_push(struct rq *rq)
rq->balance_callback = &balance_push_callback;
/*
- * Only active while going offline.
+ * Only active while going offline and when invoked on the outgoing
+ * CPU.
*/
- if (!cpu_dying(rq->cpu))
+ if (!cpu_dying(rq->cpu) && rq == this_rq())
return;
/*
next reply other threads:[~2021-08-27 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-27 14:07 Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-08-28 7:21 ` [PATCH] sched: Prevent balance_push() on remote runqueues Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-28 13:55 ` [PATCH V2] " Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-28 17:17 ` Tao Zhou
2021-08-30 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-09 9:38 ` [tip: sched/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tujb0yn1.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox