public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	wqu@suse.com, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>,
	briannorris@chromium.org, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] PCI: of: Override 64-bit flag for non-prefetchable memory below 4GB
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 22:38:03 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tumgl744.fsf@stealth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CAMj1kXHkZhgp3y_1dvKjfiEbwWDooCY0X+0HZutn5ZrsRGk15w@mail.gmail.com

Hi Ard,

Thanks for the comments.

Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> writes:

> Hi Punit,
>
> On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 at 00:11, Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Some host bridges advertise non-prefetable memory windows that are
>
> typo ^

Oops. Fixed locally.

>> entirely located below 4GB but are marked as 64-bit address memory.
>>
>> Since commit 9d57e61bf723 ("of/pci: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource
>> flags for 64-bit memory addresses"), the OF PCI range parser takes a
>> stricter view and treats 64-bit address ranges as advertised while
>> before such ranges were treated as 32-bit.
>>
>> A PCI host bridge that is modelled as PCI-to-PCI bridge cannot forward
>
> It is the root port which is modeled as a P2P bridge. The root port(s)
> together with the host bridge is what makes up the root complex.
>
>
>> 64-bit non-prefetchable memory ranges. As a result, the change in
>> behaviour due to the commit causes allocation failure for devices that
>> require non-prefetchable bus addresses.
>>
>
> AIUI, the problem is not that the device requires a non-prefetchable
> bus address, but that it fails to allocate a 32-bit BAR from a 64-bit
> non-prefetchable window.

That's right. Is the below (borrowed from your explanation) clearer?

    A PCI root port modelled as a PCI-to-PCI bridge cannot forward 64-bit
    non-prefetchable memory ranges. As a result, the change in behaviour due
    to the commit causes failure to allocate 32-bit BAR from a 64-bit
    non-prefetchable window.


If there are no further comments on the set, I'll send an update in a
couple of days.

Thanks,
Punit

>> In order to not break platforms, override the 64-bit flag for
>> non-prefetchable memory ranges that lie entirely below 4GB.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7a1e2ebc-f7d8-8431-d844-41a9c36a8911@arm.com
>> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/of.c | 8 ++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c
>> index da5b414d585a..e2e64c5c55cb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/of.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/of.c
>> @@ -346,6 +346,14 @@ static int devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device *dev,
>>                                 dev_warn(dev, "More than one I/O resource converted for %pOF. CPU base address for old range lost!\n",
>>                                          dev_node);
>>                         *io_base = range.cpu_addr;
>> +               } else if (resource_type(res) == IORESOURCE_MEM) {
>> +                       if (!(res->flags & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH)) {
>> +                               if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_64)
>> +                                       if (!upper_32_bits(range.pci_addr + range.size - 1)) {
>> +                                               dev_warn(dev, "Clearing 64-bit flag for non-prefetchable memory below 4GB\n");
>> +                                               res->flags &= ~IORESOURCE_MEM_64;
>> +                                       }
>> +                       }
>>                 }
>>
>>                 pci_add_resource_offset(resources, res, res->start - range.pci_addr);
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-02 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-31 22:10 [PATCH v2 0/4] PCI: of: Improvements to handle 64-bit attribute for non-prefetchable ranges Punit Agrawal
2021-05-31 22:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] PCI: of: Override 64-bit flag for non-prefetchable memory below 4GB Punit Agrawal
2021-06-01  5:49   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-06-02 13:38     ` Punit Agrawal [this message]
2021-05-31 22:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: of: Relax the condition for warning about non-prefetchable memory aperture size Punit Agrawal
2021-05-31 22:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] PCI: of: Refactor the check for non-prefetchable 32-bit window Punit Agrawal
2021-05-31 22:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Update PCI host bridge window to 32-bit address memory Punit Agrawal
2021-06-01 12:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] PCI: of: Improvements to handle 64-bit attribute for non-prefetchable ranges Alexandru Elisei
2021-06-02 13:39   ` Punit Agrawal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87tumgl744.fsf@stealth \
    --to=punitagrawal@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=pgwipeout@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox