From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5BEC433DB for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 07:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07A6864DEF for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 07:09:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1574652AbhCBDsd (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2021 22:48:33 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:40948 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S244095AbhCAVXf (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2021 16:23:35 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:281:8300:104d::5f6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0AC22BA; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 21:22:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net D0AC22BA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1614633770; bh=VCRXVUkenSuHp0KioD8Z4ZPbBAR1shgvy7q8YJn2q0k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=AWsbF5Zp6mmMuhNJAGxIO6wrmTXjReoBnZFoUWdYSjhr7Z/lRGTR1VHPc70H1BzGZ sSLc+ZvLZ9vfWrkOFqm5wUZtB+v062cHD0JC1omOaeZHMngCEE2dc3yzxwNFybL/Ne TytJlgh28uO/XMZg3WCIKdyHedKM559wqLswH7Y5aZGe8F6R2A+llWrPzQ7kzPBwp/ BSbbpkUc+MuQEd5zt24S2op5lcDt+RekHRapzsECCwgFoqvqp2n9MmmScEiwJRAm+9 fRA96d+s0MSAe0WkEQGwlGdtfgoFI8JEhCexcRbq/BNYCch6NJehO8YE7RFtzaQQnU frm6rX7C+wcuQ== From: Jonathan Corbet To: Dwaipayan Ray , joe@perches.com, mchehab@kernel.org Cc: lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Dwaipayan Ray Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] checkpatch: add verbose mode In-Reply-To: <20210226093827.12700-1-dwaipayanray1@gmail.com> References: <20210226093827.12700-1-dwaipayanray1@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:22:49 -0700 Message-ID: <87tupu36xi.fsf@meer.lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dwaipayan Ray writes: > Add a new verbose mode to checkpatch. The verbose test > descriptions are read from the new checkpatch documentation > file at `Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst`, which > is also added by this series. So I can certainly take the doc change, as requested. Remind me, though...should I apply the whole set, or will the checkpatch changes go via another path? Thanks, jon