From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369ECC433EA for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 07:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123B722B43 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 07:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=microchip.com header.i=@microchip.com header.b="0F5Yqp1j" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727951AbgG1HxL (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 03:53:11 -0400 Received: from esa4.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.123]:19363 "EHLO esa4.microchip.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727777AbgG1HxJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 03:53:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1595922789; x=1627458789; h=references:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=NCgo8E7J6iYnLWIERMFlSYi/bk1Up+lw+01foO6NU20=; b=0F5Yqp1jAklmivz/vNCKssuAbulqG7Z5+ZwT++553FjkVKlxRM42VvRv 2mETpFRaT4jG0Wmf9czmkdqraMszBj++BkvpzOMNVBffvKUi0hRZB/Vw5 +Ylonkwc8mpHCBm3oRM4UVMCK7fGrJ5Zl89piusxqFIy7w2TF48YinAGD zD4PxeZih6pRGUNqJByh1hJIQ5VzOmOkpwbZyzxjvIx+Iali3Nx+3mJWe NSpunRhOblc0SZPdfTD2TDZ/dJPSjoVjubPigmMyFcaBxX7D4n7BtjTX+ 9ZlVVTx/GM4iYF5ws/NqUpD+aA/gtGEkKp3lN0Ap+zUqJfEoBwuEjbncx g==; IronPort-SDR: 9hMqYVRNZCWWZDVzdqyMhx4ASsF6C1zwZ4sXT7yVaHqmywv54cblCX2voGCnD8re13oAqJ08Ed LiY1z0hRApHXgpfJew1Imemb3AzvreYokpHkAbR+VKhgeqeBtaV3C5kuc5G0KHQu0yWvuNHdnz EvmDv0100X8MnhDXlC8zs6CDB041m+WlxaSlKlEORLzuKjDjB2wwKEKWrcHBEYw5+91RnnIUV4 70ftEbXs/ahrXIFMInHaq40lA6jaRgh5c8jnDTQWMlXeArIlfL0tphuPza7XGjCXyix3M6ulN0 SqA= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,405,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="81493886" Received: from smtpout.microchip.com (HELO email.microchip.com) ([198.175.253.82]) by esa4.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 28 Jul 2020 00:53:08 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 00:52:21 -0700 Received: from soft-dev15.microsemi.net.microchip.com (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 00:53:06 -0700 References: <20200727112236.8199-1-lars.povlsen@microchip.com> <159587873833.1360974.11729154337431621644@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> <159588781925.1360974.3928941757935200801@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> From: Lars Povlsen To: Stephen Boyd List-Id: CC: Arnd Bergmann , Lars Povlsen , SoC Team , Steen Hegelund , Microchip Linux Driver Support , linux-clk , Linux ARM , , Alexandre Belloni Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] clk: sparx5: Review changes In-Reply-To: <159588781925.1360974.3928941757935200801@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:53:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87tuxsf53z.fsf@soft-dev15.microsemi.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Boyd writes: > Quoting Arnd Bergmann (2020-07-27 13:11:49) >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:39 PM Stephen Boyd wrote: >> > >> > Why was the clk driver merged to linux-next outside of the clk tree? Was >> > there some sort of dependency? >> >> I merged the entire series of the base platform support along with >> a few core drivers. I had asked for the series to be submitted to >> soc@kernel.org after all parts had been reviewed, but I missed that >> the clk driver was still missing maintainer review (I saw you had >> reviewed some patches, but apparently that was just the binding, >> not the driver). >> >> I rebased the 'arm/newsoc' branch the other day to fix another mistake, >> so if you prefer, I can rebase it again and drop the clk driver or >> all the sparx5 patches. >> > > Yes, please just drop the clk driver and I can pick it up for the next > merge window from the list and all the fixes can be rolled into one > patch. Sorry for all the commotion! With Stephen's comments I assume I don't have to submit anything new, at least not right now. Otherwise, please let me know. Cheers, -- Lars Povlsen, Microchip