From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Lee Shawn C" <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Assume 100% brightness when not in DPCD control mode
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 14:40:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tv6hinv1.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191122231616.2574-3-lyude@redhat.com>
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019, Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> wrote:
> Currently we always determine the initial panel brightness level by
> simply reading the value from DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_BRIGHTNESS_MSB/LSB. This
> seems wrong though, because if the panel is not currently in DPCD
> control mode there's not really any reason why there would be any
> brightness value programmed in the first place.
>
> This appears to be the case on the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2nd
> Generation, where the default value in these registers is always 0 on
> boot despite the fact the panel runs at max brightness by default.
> Getting the initial brightness value correct here is important as well,
> since the panel on this laptop doesn't behave well if it's ever put into
> DPCD control mode while the brightness level is programmed to 0.
>
> So, let's fix this by checking what the current backlight control mode
> is before reading the brightness level. If it's in DPCD control mode, we
> return the programmed brightness level. Otherwise we assume 100%
> brightness and return the highest possible brightness level. This also
> prevents us from accidentally programming a brightness level of 0.
>
> This is one of the many fixes that gets backlight controls working on
> the ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2nd Generation with optional 4K AMOLED screen.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> index fad470553cf9..0bf8772bc7bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> @@ -59,8 +59,23 @@ static u32 intel_dp_aux_get_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
> {
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(&connector->encoder->base);
> u8 read_val[2] = { 0x0 };
> + u8 control_reg;
> u16 level = 0;
>
> + if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_EDP_DISPLAY_CONTROL_REGISTER,
Shouldn't that be DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_MODE_SET_REGISTER instead?
> + &control_reg) != 1) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Failed to read the DPCD register 0x%x\n",
> + DP_EDP_DISPLAY_CONTROL_REGISTER);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * If we're not in DPCD control mode yet, the programmed brightness
> + * value is meaningless and we should assume max brightness
> + */
> + if (!(control_reg & DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_CONTROL_MODE_DPCD))
> + return connector->panel.backlight.max;
It's not just a bit, I think you need to check (control_reg & mask) ==
value.
BR,
Jani.
> +
> if (drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_BRIGHTNESS_MSB,
> &read_val, sizeof(read_val)) < 0) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Failed to read DPCD register 0x%x\n",
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-03 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-22 23:15 [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915: eDP DPCD aux backlight fixes Lyude Paul
2019-11-22 23:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Fix eDP DPCD aux max backlight calculations Lyude Paul
2019-12-20 10:05 ` [1/5] " Perr Yuan
2019-11-22 23:16 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Assume 100% brightness when not in DPCD control mode Lyude Paul
2019-12-03 12:40 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2019-12-03 22:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Lyude Paul
2019-12-23 7:17 ` [v2] " Perr Yuan
2019-11-22 23:16 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Fix DPCD register order in intel_dp_aux_enable_backlight() Lyude Paul
2019-12-03 12:41 ` Jani Nikula
2019-12-23 7:19 ` [3/5] " Perr Yuan
2019-11-22 23:16 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Auto detect DPCD backlight support by default Lyude Paul
2019-12-03 12:41 ` Jani Nikula
2019-12-23 7:20 ` [4/5] " Perr Yuan
2019-11-22 23:16 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Force DPCD backlight mode on X1 Extreme 2nd Gen 4K AMOLED panel Lyude Paul
2019-12-03 12:42 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tv6hinv1.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=shawn.c.lee@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox