From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@canonical.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>, Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] userns: bump idmap limits, fixes & tweaks
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 06:15:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tvyemeqe.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPP7u0WDVv0pAAFEuzL2c9Y-wVg0xG36jyH-eok=GV-r6UewZg@mail.gmail.com> (Christian Brauner's message of "Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:51:17 +0100")
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@canonical.com> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 06:46:32PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> Christian I have looked through your code and I have found one real
>> issue and of things I want to twak
>
> Cool, thanks for taking a close look Eric.
>
>>
>> The real issue is reading nr_extents multiple times when reading a map.
>> That can introduce races that will allow walking past the end of the
>> array, if the first read is 0 but the second read is > 5.
>>
>> I have also found a couple of tweaks that look like they are worth
>> implementing.
>
> Yeah, I saw that you unified some of the functions. I was thinking about this
> but wanted to keep the cases distinct even with some amount of code duplication.
> But it seems very much worth it from a maintenance perspective. Thanks!
Yes. If we have a performance regression I am willing to remove the
unification of map_id_range_down and map_id_down. But I can't imagine
that will result in a measurable performance difference. If it does
make a measurable perforamnce difference we almost certainly need to split
the bsearch case as well.
>> As all of these are very small and very straight forward I have
>> tested these and applied them all to my for-next branch
>
> Thanks for the fixes Eric. Really appreciated. If you're too swamped for stuff
> like that I'm obviously happy to do such trivial fixes myself. :)
If you would test this some more in your setup I would appreciate it,
just in case I missed something.
Given where we are in the development cycle and the correctness concerns
I just applied these as without the fix for reading extents exactly once
the code is dangerously wrong.
Eric
> Christian
>
>>
>>
>> Eric W. Biederman (5):
>> userns: Don't special case a count of 0
>> userns: Simplify the user and group mapping functions
>> userns: Don't read extents twice in m_start
>> userns: Make map_id_down a wrapper for map_id_range_down
>> userns: Simplify insert_extent
>>
>> kernel/user_namespace.c | 159 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-01 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-24 22:04 [PATCH 1/2 v6] user namespace: use union in {g,u}idmap struct Christian Brauner
2017-10-24 22:04 ` [PATCH 2/2 v6] user namespaces: bump idmap limits to 340 Christian Brauner
2017-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 0/5] userns: bump idmap limits, fixes & tweaks Eric W. Biederman
2017-10-31 23:47 ` [PATCH 1/5] userns: Don't special case a count of 0 Eric W. Biederman
2017-10-31 23:47 ` [PATCH 2/5] userns: Simplify the user and group mapping functions Eric W. Biederman
2017-10-31 23:48 ` [PATCH 3/5] userns: Don't read extents twice in m_start Eric W. Biederman
2017-11-01 8:31 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-11-01 11:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-11-01 13:05 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-11-01 13:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-01 14:01 ` Christian Brauner
2017-11-01 14:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-01 16:29 ` Christian Brauner
2017-11-01 16:31 ` Christian Brauner
2017-11-01 17:00 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-01 17:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-11-01 18:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-31 23:48 ` [PATCH 4/5] userns: Make map_id_down a wrapper for map_id_range_down Eric W. Biederman
2017-10-31 23:49 ` [PATCH 5/5] userns: Simplify insert_extent Eric W. Biederman
2017-11-01 10:51 ` [PATCH 0/5] userns: bump idmap limits, fixes & tweaks Christian Brauner
2017-11-01 11:15 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2017-11-01 13:31 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tvyemeqe.fsf@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=christian.brauner@canonical.com \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=tycho@tycho.ws \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox