From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751272AbdBWJ7x (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 04:59:53 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:27128 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750828AbdBWJ7w (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 04:59:52 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,197,1484035200"; d="scan'208";a="827565788" From: Jani Nikula To: Jim Davis , linux-doc , linux-kernel , Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: making documentation targets on v4.10 with Fedora 25 In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 11:59:49 +0200 Message-ID: <87tw7lgrca.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Jim Davis wrote: > For the Sphinx targets, htmldocs, pdfdocs, epubdocs, and cleandocs > failed. cleandocs works without the O= argument, and arguably the O= > thing isn't very useful with any of these targets, but it is supported > by the top-level Makefile. Why do you say O= isn't useful with the targets? The goal was that it would work as expected, and it did work in the past. But, as with everything, if there's no automated testing, it ceases to exist. :( BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center