From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1034837AbcIZT3f (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 26 Sep 2016 15:29:35 -0400
Received: from smtp02.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.124]:24152 "EHLO
        smtp.smtpout.orange.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S965069AbcIZT3d (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 26 Sep 2016 15:29:33 -0400
X-ME-Helo: belgarion
X-ME-Auth: amFyem1pay5yb2JlcnRAb3JhbmdlLmZy
X-ME-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 21:29:30 +0200
X-ME-IP: 109.222.115.228
From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
To: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] kill get_clock_tick_rate()
References: <1474312335-20997-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
X-URL: http://belgarath.falguerolles.org/
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 21:29:26 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1474312335-20997-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
        (Robert Jarzmik's message of "Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:12:11 +0200")
Message-ID: <87twd2bgtl.fsf@belgarion.home>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> writes:

> Hi,
>
> This serie aims at killing get_clock_tick_rate() from pxa and sa1100 and replace
> it by clock API calls.
>
> I'd like to have this reviewed and acked afterwards at least by :
>  - Russell for the mach-sa1100 and sa1100_wdt.c
>  - Stephen or Michael for the clk-pxa25x.c
>  - Thomas or Daniel for the clocksource part
>  - Wim for sa1100_wdt.c
>
> If the review converges, I'd also like to take it through the pxa/for-next tree,
> or alternatively Russell's tree if there is a dependency I'm not seeing, for
> v4.10 cycle.

Hi Russell,

Would you have time within the next 2 weeks to give this serie a review and
maybe an Ack from the sa1100 impacted parts (that would be patches 2, 3 and 4) ?

I can also resend the serie if it's easier in your workflow.

Cheers.

--
Robert