From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/4] backlight: use spin-lock to protect device list
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:00:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tx4ecz10.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1410364463-12692-3-git-send-email-dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> wrote:
> There is really no reason to use a mutex to protect a simple list. Convert
> the list-lock to a simple spinlock instead.
>
> The spin-locks prepare for a backlight_find() helper, which should
> preferably be usable from atomic context. A mutex would prevent that, so
> use an irq-save spinlock instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c b/drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c
> index 726c6c6..33b64be 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c
> @@ -16,13 +16,14 @@
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/fb.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PMAC_BACKLIGHT
> #include <asm/backlight.h>
> #endif
>
> static LIST_HEAD(backlight_dev_list);
> -static DEFINE_MUTEX(backlight_dev_list_mutex);
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(backlight_dev_list_lock);
> static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(backlight_notifier);
>
> static const char *const backlight_types[] = {
> @@ -369,9 +370,9 @@ struct backlight_device *backlight_device_register(const char *name,
> mutex_unlock(&pmac_backlight_mutex);
> #endif
>
> - mutex_lock(&backlight_dev_list_mutex);
> + spin_lock_irq(&backlight_dev_list_lock);
> list_add(&new_bd->entry, &backlight_dev_list);
> - mutex_unlock(&backlight_dev_list_mutex);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&backlight_dev_list_lock);
>
> blocking_notifier_call_chain(&backlight_notifier,
> BACKLIGHT_REGISTERED, new_bd);
> @@ -384,15 +385,16 @@ bool backlight_device_registered(enum backlight_type type)
> {
> bool found = false;
> struct backlight_device *bd;
> + unsigned long flags;
>
> - mutex_lock(&backlight_dev_list_mutex);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&backlight_dev_list_lock, flags);
> list_for_each_entry(bd, &backlight_dev_list, entry) {
> if (bd->props.type == type) {
> found = true;
> break;
> }
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&backlight_dev_list_mutex);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&backlight_dev_list_lock, flags);
>
> return found;
> }
> @@ -409,9 +411,9 @@ void backlight_device_unregister(struct backlight_device *bd)
> if (!bd)
> return;
>
> - mutex_lock(&backlight_dev_list_mutex);
> + spin_lock_irq(&backlight_dev_list_lock);
> list_del(&bd->entry);
> - mutex_unlock(&backlight_dev_list_mutex);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&backlight_dev_list_lock);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PMAC_BACKLIGHT
> mutex_lock(&pmac_backlight_mutex);
> --
> 2.1.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-11 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-10 15:54 [PATCH RFC 0/4] Linking DRM Connectors to Backlight Devices David Herrmann
2014-09-10 15:54 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] backlight: use static initializers David Herrmann
2014-09-11 8:59 ` Jani Nikula
2014-09-10 15:54 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] backlight: use spin-lock to protect device list David Herrmann
2014-09-11 9:00 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2014-09-10 15:54 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] backlight: add kernel-internal backlight API David Herrmann
2014-09-11 11:10 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-11 11:14 ` David Herrmann
2014-09-11 11:21 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-10 15:54 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] drm: link connectors to backlight devices David Herrmann
2014-09-11 6:48 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-09-11 12:22 ` David Herrmann
2014-09-11 13:06 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-09-11 16:07 ` David Herrmann
2014-09-11 12:46 ` Jani Nikula
2014-09-10 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC 0/4] Linking DRM Connectors to Backlight Devices Matthew Garrett
2014-09-11 12:48 ` David Herrmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tx4ecz10.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cooloney@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dh.herrmann@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox