From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: PPC: Add support for IOMMU in-kernel handling
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:05:43 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87txkun568.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371522772.22681.140.camel@ul30vt.home>
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 13:56 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Sun, 2013-06-16 at 21:13 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>
>> > IOMMU groups themselves don't provide security, they're accessed by
>> > interfaces like VFIO, which provide the security. Given a brief look, I
>> > agree, this looks like a possible backdoor. The typical VFIO way to
>> > handle this would be to pass a VFIO file descriptor here to prove that
>> > the process has access to the IOMMU group. This is how /dev/vfio/vfio
>> > gains the ability to setup an IOMMU domain an do mappings with the
>> > SET_CONTAINER ioctl using a group fd. Thanks,
>>
>> How do you envision that in the kernel ? IE. I'm in KVM code, gets that
>> vfio fd, what do I do with it ?
>>
>> Basically, KVM needs to know that the user is allowed to use that iommu
>> group. I don't think we want KVM however to call into VFIO directly
>> right ?
>
> Right, we don't want to create dependencies across modules. I don't
> have a vision for how this should work. This is effectively a complete
> side-band to vfio, so we're really just dealing in the iommu group
> space. Maybe there needs to be some kind of registration of ownership
> for the group using some kind of token. It would need to include some
> kind of notification when that ownership ends. That might also be a
> convenient tag to toggle driver probing off for devices in the group.
> Other ideas? Thanks,
It's actually not that bad.
eg.
struct vfio_container *vfio_container_from_file(struct file *filp)
{
if (filp->f_op != &vfio_device_fops)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
/* OK it really is a vfio fd, return the data. */
....
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_container_from_file);
...
inside KVM_CREATE_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU:
struct file *vfio_filp;
struct vfio_container *(lookup)(struct file *filp);
vfio_filp = fget(create_tce_iommu.fd);
if (!vfio)
ret = -EBADF;
lookup = symbol_get(vfio_container_from_file);
if (!lookup)
ret = -EINVAL;
else {
container = lookup(vfio_filp);
if (IS_ERR(container))
ret = PTR_ERR(container);
else
...
symbol_put(vfio_container_from_file);
}
symbol_get() won't try to load a module; it'll just fail. This is what
you want, since they must have vfio in the kernel to get a valid fd...
Hope that helps,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-19 3:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-05 6:11 [PATCH 0/4 v3] KVM: PPC: IOMMU in-kernel handling Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-05 6:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: PPC: Add support for multiple-TCE hcalls Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-16 4:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-16 22:06 ` Alexander Graf
2013-06-17 7:55 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-17 8:02 ` Alexander Graf
2013-06-17 8:34 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-17 8:40 ` Alexander Graf
2013-06-17 8:51 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-17 10:46 ` Alexander Graf
2013-06-17 10:48 ` Alexander Graf
2013-06-17 8:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-17 8:42 ` Alexander Graf
2013-06-05 6:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] powerpc: Prepare to support kernel handling of IOMMU map/unmap Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-16 4:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-16 4:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-17 9:17 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-05 6:11 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: PPC: Add support for IOMMU in-kernel handling Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-16 4:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-19 3:17 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-16 22:25 ` Alexander Graf
2013-06-16 22:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-17 3:13 ` Alex Williamson
2013-06-17 3:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-18 2:32 ` Alex Williamson
2013-06-18 4:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-18 14:48 ` Alex Williamson
2013-06-18 21:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-19 3:35 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2013-06-19 4:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-19 9:58 ` Alexander Graf
2013-06-19 14:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-19 15:49 ` Alex Williamson
2013-06-20 4:58 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-20 5:28 ` David Gibson
2013-06-20 7:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-20 8:48 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-20 14:55 ` Alex Williamson
2013-06-22 8:25 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-22 12:03 ` David Gibson
2013-06-22 14:28 ` Alex Williamson
2013-06-24 3:52 ` David Gibson
2013-06-24 4:41 ` Alex Williamson
2013-06-27 11:01 ` David Gibson
2013-06-22 23:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-24 3:54 ` David Gibson
2013-06-24 3:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-05 6:11 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: PPC: Add hugepage " Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-16 4:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-17 16:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-06-12 3:14 ` [PATCH 0/4 v3] KVM: PPC: " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-05-21 3:06 [PATCH 0/4 v2] " Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-05-21 3:06 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: PPC: Add support for " Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-05-22 21:06 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-25 2:45 ` David Gibson
2013-05-27 2:44 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-05-28 17:45 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-28 23:30 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-05-28 23:35 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-29 0:12 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-05-29 20:05 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-29 23:10 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-05-29 23:14 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-29 23:29 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-05-29 23:32 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-27 10:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-27 14:26 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-05-27 14:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-28 16:32 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-29 0:20 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87txkun568.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox