public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Cc: al viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "__d_unalias() should refuse to move mountpoints"
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:39:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87txumrct6.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50609C43.1070702@canonical.com> (Maarten Lankhorst's message of "Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:45:39 +0200")

Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com> writes:

> This reverts commit ee3efa91e240f513898050ef305a49a653c8ed90.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
>
> My thread about the regression seemed to have been ignored, so I can only
> conclude nobody objects against a full revert of this patch.
>
> My testcase is simply booting through netboot with / and ~/nfs as separate
> nfs filesystems, then doing 'ls ~/nfs' followed by 'ls ~' in a gnome-terminal
> window, then I get:

Do I read your description correctly:  Without using a bind mount you
have the same nfs filesystem mounted on / and on ~/nfs?

Something is definitely off with your configuration but if to work you
need to move mount points around then that something seems much deeper
than the __d_unalias change.

What filesystems do you have mounted where?

> ls: cannot access nfs: Device or resource busy
>
> Similar things seem to happen with ls /, /dev /proc and /sys will no longer work.
>
> Reverting this patch seems to make things work again.
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
> index 16521a9..711f421 100644
> --- a/fs/dcache.c
> +++ b/fs/dcache.c
> @@ -2387,13 +2387,14 @@ static struct dentry *__d_unalias(struct inode *inode,
>  		struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *alias)
>  {
>  	struct mutex *m1 = NULL, *m2 = NULL;
> -	struct dentry *ret = ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
> +	struct dentry *ret;
>  
>  	/* If alias and dentry share a parent, then no extra locks required */
>  	if (alias->d_parent == dentry->d_parent)
>  		goto out_unalias;
>  
>  	/* See lock_rename() */
> +	ret = ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
>  	if (!mutex_trylock(&dentry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex))
>  		goto out_err;
>  	m1 = &dentry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex;
> @@ -2401,10 +2402,8 @@ static struct dentry *__d_unalias(struct inode *inode,
>  		goto out_err;
>  	m2 = &alias->d_parent->d_inode->i_mutex;
>  out_unalias:
> -	if (likely(!d_mountpoint(alias))) {
> -		__d_move(alias, dentry);
> -		ret = alias;
> -	}
> +	__d_move(alias, dentry);
> +	ret = alias;
>  out_err:
>  	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>  	if (m2)
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-25  3:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-24 17:45 [PATCH] Revert "__d_unalias() should refuse to move mountpoints" Maarten Lankhorst
2012-09-25  3:39 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2012-09-25  6:42   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-09-25  7:05     ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-09-25  9:04       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-09-25 10:42         ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-09-25 11:03           ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-09-25 11:29             ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-09-25 11:59               ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-10-12 13:25               ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-11-29 20:06               ` Al Viro
2012-11-29 20:53                 ` Al Viro
2012-11-29 21:30                   ` Al Viro
2012-11-29 22:09                     ` Al Viro
2012-12-04 10:33                 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-12-04 10:37                   ` Maarten Lankhorst

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87txumrct6.fsf@xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox