From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756523AbYIDTOU (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2008 15:14:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754577AbYIDTOB (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2008 15:14:01 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:36060 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753998AbYIDTOA (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2008 15:14:00 -0400 To: Bernd Schubert Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: frame unwinder patches From: Andi Kleen References: Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:13:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Bernd Schubert's message of "Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:46:52 +0200") Message-ID: <87tzcvvi4p.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Bernd Schubert writes: > Hello, > > up to 2.6.22 the -mm series had these nice frame unwinder patches, > which gave beautiful stack traces. Unfortunately these frame unwinder patches > seem to have been dropped :( > > Anyone still maintaining updated patches? The SUSE kernel rpm should have an uptodate set (ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/kernel/HEAD ) I agree that they were much better than the current unwinder, also they didn't require slowing down the kernel with frame pointers. -Andi