* Re: [patch for 2.6.24? 1/1] cpufreq: Initialise default governor before use
[not found] ` <20080114091401.GB8026@elte.hu>
@ 2008-01-16 15:17 ` Johannes Weiner
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Johannes Weiner @ 2008-01-16 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: akpm, davej, rjw, tglx, venkatesh.pallipadi, linux-kernel
Hi,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> writes:
> * akpm@linux-foundation.org <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_CONSERVATIVE
>> +fs_initcall(cpufreq_gov_dbs_init);
>> +#else
>> module_init(cpufreq_gov_dbs_init);
>> +#endif
>
> silly question: why not unconditional fs_initcall() ?
Would there be a way to avoid the fs_initcall at all?
Otherwise, this is just a psychological thing to show, hey, this still
sucks, find a better solution. But perhaps the plain fs_initcall is
marker enough for that fact.
Hannes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2008-01-16 15:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <200801140906.m0E962IL020530@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <20080114091401.GB8026@elte.hu>
2008-01-16 15:17 ` [patch for 2.6.24? 1/1] cpufreq: Initialise default governor before use Johannes Weiner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox