From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56EAC3FD15D; Wed, 6 May 2026 12:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778071985; cv=none; b=rDjszQ5sEkD1IKVoWGdlgm5Zza16egEb//jRdvs74sL9FbKCDNY3paMIaI+06zRdz5tHlFWs0BU4ymFz66guCAVPiqlNP41wLulkZ2KAW51VyHsSW32mlaKIWgLyf6SEXaq4koiLRMZgLg0ZC3W7w6Q66R9cEp7iw2NFS78d2is= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778071985; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kFdIo2yceDKKWc68tIdBEDyOSlP1LCVFUR9NEBAtZ2M=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mtv66769VDqlXRBI8dPQt+sdMmDQdi0Yw5wul0xwTD4sKe4V75CnD7gE5yZ3FemC8clqrJLPpB3VucqdA0O9qKxH2OJnUvds6Ot5CUPgxc6A0DerfN7/YNM/fKxaFuz21lLX1xc2KEGDJAHlVshPtdgaZ0jAzgYkuJe4jdsuEYA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=SS1PUsVc; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=x9T0iMOL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="SS1PUsVc"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="x9T0iMOL" From: John Ogness DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1778071982; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=h+e8e50ivN9zmjgr8sswp0AWEkvSV2AwY271zvCJvUE=; b=SS1PUsVcnB+GSWnXUYOENaytOjwZJEtoROJTG9x3GiSTI/d/NA2VKsL1MkJHVCuR6HBG65 fDZhrMymJME7MUrp9WIW9V3vJJU3qhh3xNYicegrRi798BWu2DhTeInxEIIM+1Tb3D8fn+ isQakkzAksteGKVcCQBZPSDVY3WMxZO0ySLCnrajGOO6xMlpLJUxC2cI4LcZD+EyZL8nzU BUXiJgFaHmtWIJUk9b6gf4xk/NS9CR6C62YiIgDI10dG5MmWOXQQRr/4FDNNnmLpkcbE7l wIYq/tpXkwjgayncDaz4LCjlOdb82EPUjCIX3h3PxwLS/LbK9Ss02ulx28ZfQw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1778071982; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=h+e8e50ivN9zmjgr8sswp0AWEkvSV2AwY271zvCJvUE=; b=x9T0iMOL65MQAkogthF+CfBXBo9tef+uhwneEN3qo4Yx6gaXwjyodIKaH7SlTSoUflrq4C 7knW7S0hiUWdnNBw== To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Andy Shevchenko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Biju Das , Lad Prabhakar , Thierry Bultel , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Linux-sh list Subject: Re: [PATCH tty v4 3/6] serial: sh-sci: Avoid deprecated UPF_CONS_FLOW In-Reply-To: References: <20260506121606.5805-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de> <20260506121606.5805-4-john.ogness@linutronix.de> Date: Wed, 06 May 2026 14:59:02 +0206 Message-ID: <87v7d08ztd.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Hi Geert, On 2026-05-06, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c >> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c >> @@ -3369,9 +3369,12 @@ static int sci_init_single(struct platform_device *dev, >> } >> >> port->type = SCI_PUBLIC_PORT_ID(p->type); >> - port->flags = UPF_FIXED_PORT | UPF_BOOT_AUTOCONF | p->flags; >> + port->flags = UPF_FIXED_PORT | UPF_BOOT_AUTOCONF | >> + (p->flags & ~UPF_CONS_FLOW); > > This seems over-cautious to me. > The last setter of p->flags was removed in commit 37744feebc086908 > ("sh: remove sh5 support") in v5.8. No platform data ever set the > UPF_CONS_FLOW flag before. I would rather remove plat_sci_port.flags > and this "| p->flags", so we don't have to care about UPF_CONS_FLOW > in this driver at all. If there is a v5, I will drop this patch. If v4 is acceptable, the maintainer can just drop this patch. I will leave the plat_sci_port.flags removal as an excercise for the sh folks. Thanks for your feedback. John