From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 575CC2F25E0 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2025 10:19:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759141170; cv=none; b=rszxW3Z8uveFotkgh2Mh/gV7twXAsIl3y8o8Qi/cIrB9LfyL3a3gIBqSow22D+H43gqj4EFulP7BHi3ZMkbBxY6ofl/PfTVduxAD8k7pDklA7qjMcDV8sSZo4Y/tmeb1RJovT9u30URZv5PeyXoirpBiYBB2+cg6f4mOUpSSV84= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759141170; c=relaxed/simple; bh=85gBkFFqxaPIw1q7OwWI/Hyd6qYoAESLR/GviQW+bW8=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fQtMOZiu2VR+Kz9pfGrPFKyI0kR0Ffoc0ZzR7U2QL1dZX/G7DpUxPmFky/UbzMK49HdwAVJBe+hUtNABuiBzuTHOPSch/C2g03mIv+Z+ZsgJ0W0+G4nHcYxz00GCnaWM0+IEXHc4El95kxEJxna309oK3wAK7Fc8+IWSSM9kS8I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=13tNo2p8; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=+Syr7Wik; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="13tNo2p8"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="+Syr7Wik" From: Nam Cao DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1759141167; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=na+z28tfujvUbYZGUn5Elyo9Cu+dfw5ocKOwLyEHUIo=; b=13tNo2p8nc6zWD3ftjF+Dm/6rnWtaYz72CxAujFLiWRtOdHF7CfjNgDNTdS0zMymUk/qFT W2ho8qe98rmUe819LIUtyI+/FGjlsI29o5AjIxzh4ZigSOKdb7k8lchTQ9kh8g+1aBFtxY o96KFoQiaqHH76JByvV3iOqlPrYj7ZFWsQGNPXOd+BOHUF+KyIe2hc4qX58WPmPveMbud0 mCUEj+1bPclkDzlzEffHuoBKjFLDVBIfForNaOCb+vjtYJRCsk3W34O40hWkGXAQOPnpz1 fnnyme24yyXqIuYQqfIZJPsk6eqW+4/9EIBGpJWC5yCuTujXpp/6pGhKF2qd3A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1759141167; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=na+z28tfujvUbYZGUn5Elyo9Cu+dfw5ocKOwLyEHUIo=; b=+Syr7Wiki9tBCENI51Zw8YlRdpoNLpmUSdrdBLrUrpUoArChrosAoh4awSkFPiDT8kLCrv rhwrakVJ9FrBRQCA== To: Thomas Huth , Paul Walmsley , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Alexandre Ghiti , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test In-Reply-To: <87frc9h0lo.fsf@yellow.woof> References: <20250513151631.3520793-1-namcao@linutronix.de> <16b74b63-f223-4f0b-b6e5-31cea5e620b4@redhat.com> <87frc9h0lo.fsf@yellow.woof> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 12:19:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87v7l17e8g.fsf@yellow.woof> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Nam Cao writes: > Thomas Huth writes: >> Could you maybe change that into "__ASSEMBLER__" instead of "__ASSEMBLY__" ? >> I'm currently trying to get rid of the latter in the kernel sources, see: >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250606070952.498274-1-thuth@redhat.com/ > > It's been applied, it's up to riscv's maintainers how we should do this. > > I can send v3, or a follow-up patch. > > Or riscv maintainers can also squash that change into this patch, or > into your patch. > > I'm fine with any options. Riscv pull request is already created. A follow-up patch it is then. Nam