From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A2A55672; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:29:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733876959; cv=none; b=QzQ17NWec2215Te+QtmdX/WbI+8KwfERmdLOsRkkVUUU7PKE73DmtJ0dkePV2J3m4O+2m6c1CGFtuLDKPXgCLIADd67YAzHo0TIgvgCHILxadtR0AUYK4i1px4tno0uplgxC9B4NignWjYHqyov2yt4wlZi5xEgX5buXDtB6aP0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733876959; c=relaxed/simple; bh=N5dEOV5iC4qvPpuNrD0NA8LkqSeZfYzYMfG9frGYw44=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ugcl2FOP8rUuYyoRWOmo1l7WANhTLrr+nhAhx6j/6U2aV2JkQ3dkpaHBRhgTaqCj9I3sIcpCXTGNmDIukIp6HXBzvv876aKXkHd1KIgJyDN9qL1bclW13gqaZIfXw/3NcLK7Fc5Somm+6lwpg1g4QEtxQ3clICfJAeO3Ortr3Po= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=nbWbRENi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="nbWbRENi" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 48BBC403EE DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1733876957; bh=qb4HBif2F5Ff4lk7AbAxZpuERk0QwKG56MVom7PI7Cs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=nbWbRENiEQk/+FABpU9JsetZ6pt4YGua0l86I8hFkwwe1IVE4Ox6zJnYZO7qy+7qu dB63E+L1TsDXh5jrJjSfDOnqOPfAigwF893Fj3pY5YY0fhx1nlqsmV4qra23le/Oh0 DSbVY+60SdCfnO/9kN5liuJ4/3VzPqDJjBgCAJwNExk5TufElbeISs4bsKs1SmtS0h M7c1C7xZbsznNnp1rvzTRdADknGP26Z5LVNOdNmuLPxPygiTG9oJ6YGg3LNtXf7txU YJ78RA8mJ14bIsM6SKhgsHLoROdgRD2JXfKy0bCvWv7d9WaEbD4sOE7qq2Plef1pVk QNoUgwPLXk+VQ== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48BBC403EE; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:29:17 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Akira Yokosawa , Greg KH , Peter Zijlstra , Masahiro Yamada Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Akira Yokosawa Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/kernel-doc: Get -export option working again In-Reply-To: References: <87pllz2r30.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 17:29:16 -0700 Message-ID: <87v7vr12qr.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Akira Yokosawa writes: > Jonathan Corbet wrote: > [...] >> Ah ... I should have thought of that ... I'm glad you did. I've just >> pushed the fix out to linux-next, will send it Linusward in the near >> future. Thanks for fixing this, > > Your docs-fixes is based on v6.13-rc1. > This fix needs to come after v6.13-rc2. ...which will happen once the fix hits mainline - the *fix* doesn't depend on -rc2. > On current docs-next, > > ./script/kernel-doc -rst -export drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c > > returns: > > drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c:1: warning: no structured comments found > > I guess restarting everything from v6.13-rc2 would make our life much easier > for v6.14. I suppose I can rebase docs-next forward (or back-merge) if there's a real need to do so... I'm not sure how important that is to get rid of a few warnings? Thanks, jon