From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@gmail.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] ALSA: usb-audio: Fix missing xrun report in lowlatency mode
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 09:33:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v7wi484f.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874j425pjz.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 08:31:44 +0100,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:54:19 +0100,
> Leonard Crestez wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I’m investigating an issue where USB Audio does not properly send
> > XRUN notifications.
> >
> > The issue can be reproduced with aplay: enable xrun_debug, aplay -D
> > plughw:0 and CTRL-Z - no XRUN message is seen
> >
> > Disabling lowlatency_playback via modprobe parameter does make this
> > issue go away - XRUNs are reported correctly without any changes.
> >
> >
> > After a lot of tracing the following seems to be happening:
> >
> > - prepare_playback_urb find avail=48, meaning 48 bytes still to-be-played
> > - snd_usb_endpoint_next_packet_size decides that 48 is too little and
> > returns -EAGAIN. Specifically -EAGAIN is returned from
> > next_packet_size
> > - The return value of prepare_playback_urb is propagated through
> > prepare_outbound_urb back to snd_usb_queue_pending_output_urbs
> > - snd_usb_queue_pending_output_urbs receives -EAGAIN from
> > prepare_outbound_urb
> > - since err is -EAGAIN the ctx is pushed back to the ready list and
> > transmission is aborted but notify_xrun is skipped
> > - no more playback?
> >
> > It is possible to make XRUNs happen by caling notify_xrun even on
> > -EAGAIN, diff looks like this:
> >
> > diff --git a/sound/usb/endpoint.c b/sound/usb/endpoint.c
> > index 568099467dbb..da64ee0cf60a 100644
> > --- a/sound/usb/endpoint.c
> > +++ b/sound/usb/endpoint.c
> > @@ -495,10 +495,11 @@ int snd_usb_queue_pending_output_urbs(struct
> > snd_usb_endpoint *ep,
> > break;
> > if (err < 0) {
> > /* push back to ready list again for -EAGAIN */
> > if (err == -EAGAIN) {
> > push_back_to_ready_list(ep, ctx);
> > + notify_xrun(ep);
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > if (!in_stream_lock)
> > notify_xrun(ep);
> >
> >
> > This mail was not formatted as proper patch because this seems very
> > likely incorrect, it undoes an explicit check. What would a correct
> > solution look like?
>
> The -EAGAIN there itself doesn't mean the crucial xrun yet. There may
> be still pending URBS to be processed. The real XRUN happens only
> when there is no URBs pending, hence nothing will be taken further --
> at least for low-latency operation. (In the case of implicit feedback
> mode, it can be driven by the feedback from the capture stream, and
> the empty URB check might be wrong.)
>
> Could you check the change below? (totally untested)
A bit more change would be needed because it can lead to a false xrun
at draining. At stopping, it shouldn't reach to that code path.
The revised patch is below.
Takashi
--- a/sound/usb/endpoint.c
+++ b/sound/usb/endpoint.c
@@ -403,10 +403,15 @@ static int prepare_inbound_urb(struct snd_usb_endpoint *ep,
static void notify_xrun(struct snd_usb_endpoint *ep)
{
struct snd_usb_substream *data_subs;
+ struct snd_pcm_substream *psubs;
data_subs = READ_ONCE(ep->data_subs);
- if (data_subs && data_subs->pcm_substream)
- snd_pcm_stop_xrun(data_subs->pcm_substream);
+ if (!data_subs)
+ return;
+ psubs = data_subs->pcm_substream;
+ if (psubs && psubs->runtime &&
+ psubs->runtime->state == SNDRV_PCM_STATE_RUNNING)
+ snd_pcm_stop_xrun(psubs);
}
static struct snd_usb_packet_info *
@@ -562,7 +567,10 @@ static void snd_complete_urb(struct urb *urb)
push_back_to_ready_list(ep, ctx);
clear_bit(ctx->index, &ep->active_mask);
snd_usb_queue_pending_output_urbs(ep, false);
- atomic_dec(&ep->submitted_urbs); /* decrement at last */
+ /* decrement at last, and check xrun */
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ep->submitted_urbs) &&
+ !snd_usb_endpoint_implicit_feedback_sink(ep))
+ notify_xrun(ep);
return;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-20 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-19 21:54 [RFC] ALSA: usb-audio: Fix missing xrun report in lowlatency mode Leonard Crestez
2024-11-20 7:31 ` Takashi Iwai
2024-11-20 8:33 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2024-11-20 21:02 ` Leonard Crestez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v7wi484f.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=cdleonard@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox