From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F7834F88C for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711447326; cv=none; b=eX3psAjTj/FSDIylmqcOef9zP8qXGsbCYnrI5qkez+VOhrytMpo/RwW8sXbpxqkQfi62MA4tbscjfdysrCkGOQCIbxjSwA+Auhpa52RIP4jh/BLHm0x7qCH8G5GOuKD7sMiHFhbChkvxKcBb1VmJ5jd5F3msPd1PmXySoDLQ0Gw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711447326; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cIozTMyMkGTuWmMy5E6bpi3mGnPyoPmFmY+nCcyhY2g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QEpXWTJC0iYnrsQhIKKBSN9ygyZE1Sz+ObIVNsHPzSwa8F71IkumvliJh2S1LJvTEyvuKFMnvfbfHupYWy2K2z1it7OJEuWexAoGTol+Dp6ugFZFXo4WZzsHcxPC3fAqg9qV6X6WMfgpaw9av6cJCYmyIDnh3vXsKeMfZoXhBQw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=1xywrusx; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=CDDf/Q6N; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="1xywrusx"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="CDDf/Q6N" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1711447320; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=cIozTMyMkGTuWmMy5E6bpi3mGnPyoPmFmY+nCcyhY2g=; b=1xywrusxZYr06kkq2IwgfcCuF1RWn9POjuk+5aOJlDiIbW03sxe3vPh3I+CGoQBnEHc4hk cN87ZHKSVqDiJRcj1rrARayNiaYZWRkPUoBHEwboLbPDPwUFgVUEiBRYgW4ZOHCI4++O2p A4pMVd88oSG69gaiWAJjjI6k4vtY75AhYyXiyqBrXZpBVbsAO4yh+3BlUU5Uo4KPekY8e1 MEOZIT4ErHniAw/0ZlJWsk0EvrhU9y7GvulJM8Kgu+Ko0XYbFNZH9sQtAKV0y4ArwoLsXK ds25XIzGBCMyNKDSOf0/8QCKDpQsnfxaER1vwq15+ydLlTz9ltGJpwq/5lASvg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1711447320; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=cIozTMyMkGTuWmMy5E6bpi3mGnPyoPmFmY+nCcyhY2g=; b=CDDf/Q6NBUFXVngr85o+dhunicsYWsdLkdyw7KgGgw6zKC0FXpV+2trQHXEA8DhHuhVwdL uYsGEhuIB6pQ61Dw== To: Tiezhu Yang , Huacai Chen , Arnd Bergmann , Marc Zyngier Cc: loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, loongson-kernel@lists.loongnix.cn Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Give chance to build under !CONFIG_SMP In-Reply-To: <20240326062101.9822-1-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> References: <20240326062101.9822-1-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 11:02:00 +0100 Message-ID: <87v859e2g7.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, Mar 26 2024 at 14:21, Tiezhu Yang wrote: > > This patch is based on 6.9-rc1. Please let me know if it is better to > split it into two patches, the first one is for arch/loongarch and the > second one is for drivers/irqchip. Why are you asking? It's documented that patches should be split, no?