public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	x86@kernel.org, johan+linaro@kernel.org,
	isaku.yamahata@intel.com, mikelley@microsoft.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/ioapic: Don't return 0 from arch_dynirq_lower_bound()
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 17:37:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v8i1yuvc.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230328144834.GA17868@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>

On Tue, Mar 28 2023 at 07:48, Saurabh Singh Sengar wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 06:59:04AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> 
>> Is there any reason why this variable can't be initialized to a fixed nonzero number, like 16?
>
> Yes, initializing gst_top to any non-zero value should fix this issue.
> At first I thought to intialize gst_top to 1.

That works only in your case. Some boot time registrations of IO_APICs
use gsi_top as the base. So initializing gsi_top to N would move IOAPIC[0]
interrupts out to irq N... and make the legacy interrupts fail.

That whole IOAPIC registration could do with some major cleanup, but
that's a different story.

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-12 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-28  7:30 [PATCH v2] x86/ioapic: Don't return 0 from arch_dynirq_lower_bound() Saurabh Sengar
2023-03-28 13:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2023-03-28 14:48   ` Saurabh Singh Sengar
2023-04-12 15:37     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2023-04-11  6:09 ` Saurabh Singh Sengar
2023-04-12 15:55 ` [tip: x86/apic] " tip-bot2 for Saurabh Sengar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v8i1yuvc.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ssengar@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox