public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: tag_dsa: Fix tx from VLAN uppers on non-filtering bridges
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 14:32:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v8womuxb.fsf@waldekranz.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220308093653.c2enspat5mvah4n3@skbuf>

On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 11:36, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 12:05:48PM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
>> In this situation (VLAN filtering disabled on br0):
>> 
>>     br0.10
>>      /
>>    br0
>>    / \
>> swp0 swp1
>> 
>> When a frame is transmitted from the VLAN upper, the bridge will send
>> it down to one of the switch ports with forward offloading
>> enabled. This will cause tag_dsa to generate a FORWARD tag. Before
>> this change, that tag would have it's VID set to 10, even though VID
>> 10 is not loaded in the VTU.
>> 
>> Before the blamed commit, the frame would trigger a VTU miss and be
>> forwarded according to the PVT configuration. Now that all fabric
>> ports are in 802.1Q secure mode, the frame is dropped instead.
>> 
>> Therefore, restrict the condition under which we rewrite an 802.1Q tag
>> to a DSA tag. On standalone port's, reuse is always safe since we will
>> always generate FROM_CPU tags in that case. For bridged ports though,
>> we must ensure that VLAN filtering is enabled, which in turn
>> guarantees that the VID in question is loaded into the VTU.
>> 
>> Fixes: d352b20f4174 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Improve multichip isolation of standalone ports")
>> Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>
>> ---
>>  net/dsa/tag_dsa.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/net/dsa/tag_dsa.c b/net/dsa/tag_dsa.c
>> index c8b4bbd46191..e4b6e3f2a3db 100644
>> --- a/net/dsa/tag_dsa.c
>> +++ b/net/dsa/tag_dsa.c
>> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *dsa_xmit_ll(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
>>  				   u8 extra)
>>  {
>>  	struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_slave_to_port(dev);
>> +	struct net_device *br_dev;
>>  	u8 tag_dev, tag_port;
>>  	enum dsa_cmd cmd;
>>  	u8 *dsa_header;
>> @@ -149,7 +150,16 @@ static struct sk_buff *dsa_xmit_ll(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
>>  		tag_port = dp->index;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_8021Q)) {
>> +	br_dev = dsa_port_bridge_dev_get(dp);
>> +
>> +	/* If frame is already 802.1Q tagged, we can convert it to a DSA
>> +	 * tag (avoiding a memmove), but only if the port is standalone
>> +	 * (in which case we always send FROM_CPU) or if the port's
>> +	 * bridge has VLAN filtering enabled (in which case the CPU port
>> +	 * will be a member of the VLAN).
>> +	 */
>> +	if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_8021Q) &&
>> +	    (!br_dev || br_vlan_enabled(br_dev))) {
>
> Conservative patch. If !br_dev, we could/should inject using
> MV88E6XXX_VID_STANDALONE. But since we use FROM_CPU, the classified VLAN
> probably does not make a difference that I can see, so there is no
> reason to change this now (and certainly not in the same patch).

We could also do that. My reasoning was:
1. There is no functional difference with a FROM_CPU frame - the CPU's
   word is law.
2. Performance should be better since you can avoid a per-packet memmove
   to make room for the tag, if the non-ethertyped version of DSA is
   used.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-08 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-07 11:05 [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: tag_dsa: Fix tx from VLAN uppers on non-filtering bridges Tobias Waldekranz
2022-03-07 22:55 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-03-08  9:36 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-03-08 13:32   ` Tobias Waldekranz [this message]
2022-03-08 11:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v8womuxb.fsf@waldekranz.com \
    --to=tobias@waldekranz.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox