From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524DCC433DB for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 21:27:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06DFC61936 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 21:27:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229883AbhCTV07 (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Mar 2021 17:26:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57668 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229766AbhCTV0j (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Mar 2021 17:26:39 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42E7FC061574 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 14:26:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1616275597; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pvPr3ZokkYfdRQfsfefZc9G5iA0ihV8cgVIMTtZ80Ps=; b=bYigIbRTJnxVMz2ORW+UGG7xdHMglzCSnQKA9LNWRM2p2TYhMnjsVqYW/5NZnI3hulOwM/ qYOUhkTJRjcXzmG6IHmuxQ+nf2vTgTb3tG+FktOS+eh7TI2RaByuAZfnIR0yJiz6gabsP1 4v6QhrH0uPba5+aBfMoiLjHTB2agVP+cnkChLEyl0VzG1/tELu1uXWwR2CC6ld1zYiPHUX o2Nx9IlRULE881B4zrDTsqszqwGH97d+uE9yfbIn7wko+lWu+XAt9sGp48bKruIMWhJmdH MTLIBrm/tUcPquoPhIqztjjUJZLCF7Oes4X0lM3B7s8982DAMzd4nYST1LyAKA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1616275597; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pvPr3ZokkYfdRQfsfefZc9G5iA0ihV8cgVIMTtZ80Ps=; b=nk/wVc71Z3mZcAAEZ86gi9fwt0dhbUlHMDmD18Oap1bZ8Ozb3vBkTKxj6FT1BaFAJSqFjF FGTdX30iLNz+j5BA== To: "Chang S. Bae" , bp@suse.de, luto@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Cc: len.brown@intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, jing2.liu@intel.com, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chang.seok.bae@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 19/22] x86/fpu/amx: Enable the AMX feature in 64-bit mode In-Reply-To: <20210221185637.19281-20-chang.seok.bae@intel.com> References: <20210221185637.19281-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com> <20210221185637.19281-20-chang.seok.bae@intel.com> Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 22:26:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87v99la54i.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 21 2021 at 10:56, Chang S. Bae wrote: > In 64-bit mode, include the AMX state components in > XFEATURE_MASK_USER_SUPPORTED. > > The XFD feature will be used to dynamically expand the xstate per-task > buffer on the first use. This patch touches absolutely nothing XFD related. What's the message here? Thanks, tglx