From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptrace: restore smp_rmb() in __ptrace_may_access()
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 10:59:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v9xtz1yt.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190529113157.227380-1-jannh@google.com> (Jann Horn's message of "Wed, 29 May 2019 13:31:57 +0200")
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> writes:
> Restore the read memory barrier in __ptrace_may_access() that was deleted
> a couple years ago. Also add comments on this barrier and the one it pairs
> with to explain why they're there (as far as I understand).
My bad.
When I made that change I could not figure out what that barrier was
for, and it did not appear necessary.
Do you happen to know of any real world problems?
Reviewed-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
If no one else would prefer to pick this up I will grab it. I have
another bug fix I already queueing for 5.2-rcX.
Thank you,
Eric
>
> Fixes: bfedb589252c ("mm: Add a user_ns owner to mm_struct and fix ptrace permission checks")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
> ---
> (I have no clue whatsoever what the relevant tree for this is, but I
> guess Oleg is the relevant maintainer?)
>
> kernel/cred.c | 9 +++++++++
> kernel/ptrace.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cred.c b/kernel/cred.c
> index 45d77284aed0..07e069d00696 100644
> --- a/kernel/cred.c
> +++ b/kernel/cred.c
> @@ -450,6 +450,15 @@ int commit_creds(struct cred *new)
> if (task->mm)
> set_dumpable(task->mm, suid_dumpable);
> task->pdeath_signal = 0;
> + /*
> + * If a task drops privileges and becomes nondumpable,
> + * the dumpability change must become visible before
> + * the credential change; otherwise, a __ptrace_may_access()
> + * racing with this change may be able to attach to a task it
> + * shouldn't be able to attach to (as if the task had dropped
> + * privileges without becoming nondumpable).
> + * Pairs with a read barrier in __ptrace_may_access().
> + */
> smp_wmb();
> }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
> index 5710d07e67cf..e54452c2954b 100644
> --- a/kernel/ptrace.c
> +++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
> @@ -324,6 +324,16 @@ static int __ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int mode)
> return -EPERM;
> ok:
> rcu_read_unlock();
> + /*
> + * If a task drops privileges and becomes nondumpable (through a syscall
> + * like setresuid()) while we are trying to access it, we must ensure
> + * that the dumpability is read after the credentials; otherwise,
> + * we may be able to attach to a task that we shouldn't be able to
> + * attach to (as if the task had dropped privileges without becoming
> + * nondumpable).
> + * Pairs with a write barrier in commit_creds().
> + */
> + smp_rmb();
> mm = task->mm;
> if (mm &&
> ((get_dumpable(mm) != SUID_DUMP_USER) &&
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-29 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-29 11:31 [PATCH] ptrace: restore smp_rmb() in __ptrace_may_access() Jann Horn
2019-05-29 15:59 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2019-05-29 16:01 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-29 16:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-29 17:38 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-30 1:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-31 15:04 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-30 10:34 ` Andrea Parri
2019-05-31 9:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-30 12:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-31 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31 9:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-29 21:02 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-29 18:55 ` Kees Cook
2019-05-30 12:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-31 11:56 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-31 13:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-31 19:37 ` Jann Horn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v9xtz1yt.fsf@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox