public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	mst@redhat.com, krkumar2@in.ibm.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, bhutchings@solarflare.com,
	jwhan@filewood.snu.ac.kr, shiyer@redhat.com,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next rfc v7 2/3] virtio_net: multiqueue support
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:34:08 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vccjj3hj.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354011360-39479-3-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>

Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> writes:
> +static const struct ethtool_ops virtnet_ethtool_ops;
> +
> +/*
> + * Converting between virtqueue no. and kernel tx/rx queue no.
> + * 0:rx0 1:tx0 2:cvq 3:rx1 4:tx1 ... 2N+1:rxN 2N+2:txN
> + */
> +static int vq2txq(struct virtqueue *vq)
> +{
> +	int index = virtqueue_get_queue_index(vq);
> +	return index == 1 ? 0 : (index - 2) / 2;
> +}
> +
> +static int txq2vq(int txq)
> +{
> +	return txq ? 2 * txq + 2 : 1;
> +}
> +
> +static int vq2rxq(struct virtqueue *vq)
> +{
> +	int index = virtqueue_get_queue_index(vq);
> +	return index ? (index - 1) / 2 : 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rxq2vq(int rxq)
> +{
> +	return rxq ? 2 * rxq + 1 : 0;
> +}
> +

I thought MST changed the proposed spec to make the control queue always
the last one, so this logic becomes trivial.

> +static int virtnet_set_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> +{
> +	struct scatterlist sg;
> +	struct virtio_net_ctrl_rfs s;
> +	struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
> +
> +	s.virtqueue_pairs = vi->curr_queue_pairs;
> +	sg_init_one(&sg, &s, sizeof(s));
> +
> +	if (!vi->has_cvq)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_RFS,
> +				  VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_RFS_VQ_PAIRS_SET, &sg, 1, 0)){
> +		dev_warn(&dev->dev, "Fail to set the number of queue pairs to"
> +			 " %d\n", vi->curr_queue_pairs);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}

Where do we check the VIRTIO_NET_F_RFS bit?

>  static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  {
> -	int err;
> +	int i, err;
>  	struct net_device *dev;
>  	struct virtnet_info *vi;
> +	u16 curr_queue_pairs;
> +
> +	/* Find if host supports multiqueue virtio_net device */
> +	err = virtio_config_val(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_RFS,
> +				offsetof(struct virtio_net_config,
> +				max_virtqueue_pairs), &curr_queue_pairs);
> +
> +	/* We need at least 2 queue's */
> +	if (err)
> +		curr_queue_pairs = 1;

Huh?  Just call this queue_pairs.  It's not curr_ at all...

> +	if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ))
> +		vi->has_cvq = true;
> +
> +	/* Use single tx/rx queue pair as default */
> +	vi->curr_queue_pairs = 1;
> +	vi->max_queue_pairs = curr_queue_pairs;

See...

Cheers,
Rusty.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-12-03  2:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-27 10:15 [net-next rfc v7 0/3] Multiqueue virtio-net Jason Wang
2012-11-27 10:15 ` [net-next rfc v7 1/3] virtio-net: separate fields of sending/receiving queue from virtnet_info Jason Wang
2012-12-03  1:55   ` Rusty Russell
     [not found]     ` <3524590.ZWGua7A8ne@jason-thinkpad-t430s>
2012-12-03 11:18       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-04  9:22         ` Jason Wang
2012-12-04  3:43       ` Rusty Russell
2012-12-04  9:23         ` Jason Wang
2012-11-27 10:15 ` [net-next rfc v7 2/3] virtio_net: multiqueue support Jason Wang
2012-12-02 16:06   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-03  5:47     ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03  2:04   ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2012-12-03  6:05     ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03  9:47       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-03 10:01         ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 11:11           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-04  9:24             ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 10:14   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-03 10:30     ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 11:00       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-04  7:35       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-04  9:27         ` Jason Wang
2012-11-27 10:16 ` [net-next rfc v7 3/3] virtio-net: change the number of queues through ethtool Jason Wang
2012-12-02 16:09   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-03  6:09     ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 11:25       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-04  0:22         ` Ben Hutchings

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87vccjj3hj.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jwhan@filewood.snu.ac.kr \
    --cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shiyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox