From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933172Ab2GCEjJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2012 00:39:09 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:54866 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751089Ab2GCEjI (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2012 00:39:08 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: Rafael Aquini , "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization Subject: Re: RFD: virtio balloon API use (was Re: [PATCH 5 of 5] virtio: expose added descriptors immediately) In-Reply-To: <20120702160814.GB1750@t510.redhat.com> References: <20120701092051.GA4515@redhat.com> <87d34fx990.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20120702072558.GA8268@redhat.com> <20120702160814.GB1750@t510.redhat.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:17:46 +0930 Message-ID: <87vci5wtzh.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 13:08:19 -0300, Rafael Aquini wrote: > As 'locking in balloon', may I assume the approach I took for the compaction case > is OK and aligned to address these concerns of yours? If not, do not hesitate in > giving me your thoughts, please. I'm respinning a V3 series to address a couple > of extra nitpicks from the compaction standpoint, and I'd love to be able to > address any extra concern you might have on the balloon side of that work. It's orthogonal, though looks like they clash textually :( I'll re-spin MST's patch on top of yours, and include both in my tree, otherwise linux-next will have to do the merge. But I'll await your push before pushing to Linus next merge window. Thanks, Rusty.