From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf top: Fix a race in callchain handling
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 11:10:59 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vck3ii18.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878vh4srmh.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (Namhyung Kim's message of "Mon, 07 May 2012 10:32:22 +0900")
Hi,
On Mon, 07 May 2012 10:32:22 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Sun, 6 May 2012 15:32:12 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Sun, May 06, 2012 at 11:25:07AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>>> 2012-05-05 (토), 20:53 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
>>> > I'm looking how to get that fixed with Peter concerns addressed.
>>>
>>> I guess it's gonna be a non-trivial job. As far as I can see, the hists
>>> code can handle up to two concurrent threads regardless of the callchain
>>> cursor problem. And also guess that other areas of libperf also doesn't
>>> support the true concurrency, right?
>>
>> Right, but making it even less concurrent is something we should avoid
>> 8-)
>>
>> How about this one instead? At least we would be able to, concurrently,
>> process multiple, unrelated hists:
>
> I thought about it before, but it still cannot protect it from accessing
> a hists by multiple concurrent threads. IOW if two threads call the
> function to a same hists at the same time, ->callchain_collapse_cursor
> would still get the race problem - so crashed.
>
> I guess callchain_cursor should be thread-local, eventually. No need to
> make it hist-local IMHO.
>
So, any thoughts?
Thanks,
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-11 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-05 15:23 [PATCH] perf top: Fix a race in callchain handling Namhyung Kim
2012-05-05 18:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-05 23:53 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-06 2:25 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-05-06 18:07 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-07 1:22 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-05-06 18:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-07 1:32 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-05-11 2:10 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2012-05-11 15:01 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-11 16:25 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vck3ii18.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
--to=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox