From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754010Ab1HVV4A (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:56:00 -0400 Received: from www85.your-server.de ([213.133.104.85]:51440 "EHLO www85.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751204Ab1HVVz5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:55:57 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1453 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:55:57 EDT From: Olaf Dietsche To: Remy Bohmer Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] accessfs-2.6.38-0.25 forward ported to linux-3.0, and fix build (seems also valid for 2.6.38) References: Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 23:31:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87vctpw2tg.fsf@rat.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Authenticated-Sender: webmaster@olafdietsche.de Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Remy, Remy Bohmer writes: > - accessfs-2.6.38-0.25-fix-build.patch: This patch has to be applied > to make it compile on 3.0 when CONFIG_NET_HOOKS and CONFIG_ACCESS_FS > both are NOT set. > I expect that this fix-build patch has to be applied to the 2.6.38 > edition as well, since it results in unresolved externals that should > be there on 2.6.38 as well. Thanks for spotting. Unfortunately, I never tested this combination. :-( Regards, Olaf