From: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: paulus <paulus@samba.org>,
stephane eranian <eranian@googlemail.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/13] perf pmu interface changes -v3
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 00:34:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vd8o8c0v.fsf@linux-g6p1.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1278690734.1900.232.camel@laptop>
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:52:14 +0200, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -256,11 +256,14 @@ static int sh_pmu_add(struct perf_event
> struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
> struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> int idx = hwc->idx;
> + int ret = -EAGAIN;
> +
> + perf_pmu_disable(event->pmu);
>
> if (__test_and_set_bit(idx, cpuc->used_mask)) {
> idx = find_first_zero_bit(cpuc->used_mask, sh_pmu->num_events);
> if (idx == sh_pmu->num_events)
> - return -EAGAIN;
> + goto ret;
>
> __set_bit(idx, cpuc->used_mask);
> hwc->idx = idx;
> @@ -273,8 +276,11 @@ static int sh_pmu_add(struct perf_event
> sh_pmu_start(event, PERF_EF_RELOAD);
>
> perf_event_update_userpage(event);
> + ret = 0;
>
> - return 0;
> +out:
> + perf_pmu_enable(event->pmu);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void sh_pmu_read(struct perf_event *event)
This patch results in the following compilation error,
CC arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c: In function 'sh_pmu_add':
arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c:281: error: label 'out' defined but not used
arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c:266: error: label 'ret' used but not defined
arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c: In function 'sh_pmu_setup':
arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c:343: error: parameter 'cpuhw' is initialized
arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c:343: error: 'cpu' undeclared (first use in this function)
arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c:343: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c:343: error: for each function it appears in.)
arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c:343: error: left-hand operand of comma expression has no effect
arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c:345: error: expected declaration specifiers before 'memset'
arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c:346: error: expected declaration specifiers before '}' token
arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c:350: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c:366: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c:378: error: old-style parameter declarations in prototyped function definition
arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c:378: error: expected '{' at end of input
make[1]: *** [arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.o] Error 2
You can pick up a CodeSourcery SH toolchain from
http://www.codesourcery.com/sgpp/lite/superh/portal/release1298 in case
you wanted to build any further changes.
Does this patch look OK? It fixes the above compilation error for me.
diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c
index 3bfd70b..bcfb325 100644
--- a/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static int sh_pmu_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
if (__test_and_set_bit(idx, cpuc->used_mask)) {
idx = find_first_zero_bit(cpuc->used_mask, sh_pmu->num_events);
if (idx == sh_pmu->num_events)
- goto ret;
+ goto out;
__set_bit(idx, cpuc->used_mask);
hwc->idx = idx;
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static struct pmu pmu = {
};
static void sh_pmu_setup(int cpu)
-
+{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
memset(cpuhw, 0, sizeof(struct cpu_hw_events));
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-09 23:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-09 8:21 [RFC][PATCH 00/13] perf pmu interface changes -v3 Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 8:21 ` [PATCH 01/13] perf, x86: Fix Nehalem PMU quirk Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 8:21 ` [PATCH 02/13] sparc64: Fix maybe_change_configuration() PCR setting Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 8:21 ` [PATCH 03/13] perf: Fix CPU hotplug Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 8:21 ` [PATCH 04/13] perf, powerpc: Use perf_sample_data_init() for the FSL code Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 8:21 ` [PATCH 05/13] perf, powerpc: Convert the FSL driver to use local64_t Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 8:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/13] perf: deconstify struct pmu Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 8:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/13] perf: register pmu implementations Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 8:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/13] perf: Unindent labels Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 8:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/13] perf: Reduce perf_disable() usage Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 8:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/13] perf: Per PMU disable Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 10:17 ` Paul Mackerras
2010-07-09 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 10:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 8:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/13] perf: Default PMU ops Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 8:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/13] perf: Shrink hw_perf_event Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 8:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/13] perf: Rework the PMU methods Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-10 13:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-07-10 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 10:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/13] perf pmu interface changes -v3 Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 15:11 ` Will Deacon
2010-07-09 15:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 23:34 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2010-07-09 16:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vd8o8c0v.fsf@linux-g6p1.site \
--to=matt@console-pimps.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@googlemail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox